QB Combo Possibilities: Which Do You Want (QB Rumors: Verse 10)

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Enough with the Colt McCoy man!!!

[los panda]

tannehill is garbage. weeden is the 3rd best qb prospect in this draft

[SBXVII]

Originally Posted by los panda

tannehill is garbage. weeden is the 3rd best qb prospect in this draft

Everyone here will tell you I'm a huge Weeden fan also. I'm just showing there are others who believe that Tannehill might be better in our system then RGIII. Namely because (I think) he played in a pro style of offense in college instead of the spread. Lindy's Sports Draft Mag compares him to Mark Sanchez, probably the closest comparison they could find. I did find it funny they compared Osweiler to Matt Schaub.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by los panda

tannehill is garbage. weeden is the 3rd best qb prospect in this draft

Don't worry next years class will be better.

[Dirtbag59]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

Don't worry next years class will be better.

From hear on in I'm putting bounties on big hits against anyone that doesn't support RG3. Double cash if that same person tries to sell you on next years class over this years.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by Dirtbag59

From hear on in I'm putting bounties on big hits against anyone that doesn't support RG3. Double cash if that same person tries to sell you on next years class over this years.

Since it is the offseason, Matty should put bounties on people that start pointless/repetitive threads.

[SBXVII]

Originally Posted by Dirtbag59

From hear on in I'm putting bounties on big hits against anyone that doesn't support RG3. Double cash if that same person tries to sell you on next years class over this years.

Ok, blast me brother. I thought I read somewhere that MS really wanted Barkley whom we could simply continue to fix up the offensive side of the ball then go all in next year with 2 yrs worth of drafts if you all want to.

[Dirtbag59]

Originally Posted by SBXVII

Ok, blast me brother. I thought I read somewhere that MS really wanted Barkley whom we could simply continue to fix up the offensive side of the ball then go all in next year with 2 yrs worth of drafts if you all want to.

I still maintain that you are going to have to hit big on an awful lot of picks to even think of equaling the impact of a strong, smart, and mobile QB like RGIII.

I mean think about it. Could we ever have a shot of trading Orakpo, Helu, Royster, Kerrigan, Williams, Landry, Jenkins, Thomas, Rogers, Campbell, and Kelly for Cam Newton?

By the way thats 6 first round picks, 3 second round picks, a fourth, and a sixth round pick. And of those 6 first round picks 3 were top 10 picks.

[SBXVII]

Originally Posted by Dirtbag59

I still maintain that you are going to have to hit big on an awful lot of picks to even think of equaling the impact of a strong, smart, and mobile QB like RGIII.

I mean think about it. Could we ever have a shot of trading Orakpo, Helu, Royster, Kerrigan, Williams, Landry, Jenkins, Thomas, Rogers, Campbell, and Kelly for Cam Newton?

Nope. No different then how hard it would be to trade them for someone like Brady and he was a 6th round draft pick.

[SBXVII]

[QUOTE=Dirtbag59;891928]I still maintain that you are going to have to hit big on an awful lot of picks to even think of equaling the impact of a strong, smart, and mobile QB like RGIII.

I mean think about it. Could we ever have a shot of trading Orakpo, Helu, Royster, Kerrigan, Williams, Landry, Jenkins, Thomas, Rogers, Campbell, and Kelly for Cam Newton?

By the way thats 6 first round picks, 3 second round picks, a fourth, and a sixth round pick. And of those 6 first round picks 3 were top 10 picks.[/QUOTE]

I like to look at the bright side.... the other 5 picks were not top 10 and they are starting also. Apparently the Skins got really good value for them to be after the top 10 and be starters.

I like to think if the team gets the right player with the most skills they are looking for at whatever position they will work out. RGIII might be the 2nd best QB in this yrs draft but someone like Tannehill might be better suited for what we do simply because his learning curve might be smaller. Yes he might need to work on his skills but if he was in a pro system in college I feel he might learn quicker and be more usefull right out of college. < hopefully I said that right. lol.

[los panda]

what me worry? i can barely recall watching brad johnson play for us. i'm used to the trash

[los panda]

if brennan is michael jordan, consider tannehill scottie pippen

[los panda]

does anyone believe that peyton manning was somewhat protected by officials (more so than other qbs) during his days in indy?

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by los panda

does anyone believe that peyton manning was somewhat protected by officials (more so than other qbs) during his days in indy?

I think Brady is slightly more protected.

[los panda]

is that a "yes, but"? i was at the game when brady slip and fletch pumped his iron. it was a tough call. but, i do agree that brady is protected more so than other qbs