Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


bigger role for Betts this year?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-05-2009, 12:49 PM   #1
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
Re: bigger role for Betts this year?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
Yup same here, I don't see any of those guys as a real threat to Betts at all. In reality it would be a bit of a surprise to see any of them make the team.
Unless Aldridge is terrible in camp and/or shows he cannot be relied upon in the return game I can see them sticking with him over Rock. I don't think the Zorn regime has as much loyalty to Rock as the previous coach and they have all talked about seeking more explosiveness which Aldridge brings.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!

Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2009, 11:22 AM   #2
vallin21
The Starter
 
vallin21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,180
Re: bigger role for Betts this year?

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddyg12 View Post
So who said those guys were signed to compete for the #2 job? Your post is the first I'd heard of that. Don't recall any coaches or Vinny saying that.

I took those signings to be more competition for Rock, whose contract is less, and who also returns kicks. Of course, anyone can potentially take a spot, Portis' spot included.

Betts is getting up there in years so of course they're going to look to replace him in the near future, but I certainly don't think those 3 guys we signed are an attempt to replace or demote him.

Also, take a look at Portis' numbers in the 2nd half of the year, since it seems that's what you're doing w/Betts. The running game fell off big time. Do you blame that all on Portis since his "production" dropped?
Last time I checked competion is when a bunch of guys compete to see whose the best, so if Betts looks bad in Training Camp and in Preseason you wouldn't think someone like Marcus Mason who could paly better than Betts, would then battle for the #2 job? You have to understand this is a "what have you done for me lately league" and Betts hasn't done alot when given the oppurtunity. No one should automatically assume anyone has a spot just because "Vinny said it in the offseason" or because Betts has been a #2 back for a few years, because things change. It doesn't matter what the coaches says in June, because this is the Offseason! Alot of coaches say shit in June, but their dead wrong come September. Until Training Camp starts we won't know anything about where the RB lineup stands. As for Portis I never compared Portis to Betts because that's irrelevant, all I said was when Betts is in the lineup he has been average at best.
vallin21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2009, 11:40 AM   #3
freddyg12
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: bigger role for Betts this year?

Quote:
Originally Posted by vallin21 View Post
Last time I checked competion is when a bunch of guys compete to see whose the best, so if Betts looks bad in Training Camp and in Preseason you wouldn't think someone like Marcus Mason who could paly better than Betts, would then battle for the #2 job? You have to understand this is a "what have you done for me lately league" and Betts hasn't done alot when given the oppurtunity. No one should automatically assume anyone has a spot just because "Vinny said it in the offseason" or because Betts has been a #2 back for a few years, because things change. It doesn't matter what the coaches says in June, because this is the Offseason! Alot of coaches say shit in June, but their dead wrong come September. Until Training Camp starts we won't know anything about where the RB lineup stands. As for Portis I never compared Portis to Betts because that's irrelevant, all I said was when Betts is in the lineup he has been average at best.
I'm not assuming anything. I'm giving my opinion that i don't see those 3 guys as a threat to betts.

YOU assumed that they were signed to compete for the #2 spot, from what your post said, as if the coaches think Betts needs to be replaced. If what you meant to say was that they signed these guys because they want something more out of the rb position & potentially any of these guys could supplant Betts, and for that matter, Portis. Well, I agree w/you, and if you read my earlier post you'll see I mention that.

Basically anyone can be replaced at any time, but that's stating the obvious. You implied 3 guys were signed to specifically compete for the #2 spot. I disagree, but it goes w/out saying that it's possible for them to earn it.
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2009, 09:17 AM   #4
Daseal
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 42
Posts: 8,341
Re: bigger role for Betts this year?

I want to see us give another back every 3rd or so series. Portis is a very good back, but he's getting a bi long in the tooth (for a RB) and I can't think of anything that could help this team more than Portis with something left in the tank in the 4th quarter or the game and season. Stop killing Portis by week 11.
__________________
Best. Player. Available.
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2009, 09:17 AM   #5
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,846
Re: bigger role for Betts this year?

Betts has to play a bigger role this year or Portis will again have nothing left by the 2nd half of the season.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2009, 10:26 AM   #6
KLHJ2
Inactive
 
KLHJ2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 47
Posts: 5,829
Re: bigger role for Betts this year?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
Betts has to play a bigger role this year or Portis will again have nothing left by the 2nd half of the season.
I do not think that it has to be Betts as long as somebody spells him. If CP gets more than 75% of the carries as frequently as we run the ball, he isn't going to make it much longer.

In all honesty I would like to see some young blood at the RB position. I just don't think that Betts is hungry or explosive enough. I do not know the man personally, I am just speaking from what I have seen on the field. Maybe I just haven't seen enough of him, but I am not sold.
KLHJ2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2009, 09:47 AM   #7
freddyg12
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: bigger role for Betts this year?

totally agree w/Matty & Daseal.

Does anyone have a theory as to why Betts hasn't gotten may carries the last 2 years, even as the coaches seem to always praise him in training camp & the team re-signed him to a nice deal?
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2009, 06:34 PM   #8
Meks
Pro Bowl
 
Meks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Jersey
Age: 40
Posts: 5,831
Re: bigger role for Betts this year?

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddyg12 View Post
totally agree w/Matty & Daseal.

Does anyone have a theory as to why Betts hasn't gotten may carries the last 2 years, even as the coaches seem to always praise him in training camp & the team re-signed him to a nice deal?

because we lost to the giants on the goal line and portis WASNT, on the field.

images/memorys do burn into brains...

betts is OK, but i cant really imagine a starter on ne other team he's better than off hand.
__________________
R.I.P #21SEAN TAYLOR

Last edited by Meks; 06-10-2009 at 06:40 PM.
Meks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2009, 06:49 PM   #9
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: bigger role for Betts this year?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Meks View Post
because we lost to the giants on the goal line and portis WASNT, on the field.

images/memorys do burn into brains...

betts is OK, but i cant really imagine a starter on ne other team he's better than off hand.
Or it could be the fact that we called the same damn play 4 times in a row. That was one of my most frustrating moments as a Skins fan. I was cussing my brains out. My Dad was at that game. Poor guy had to see that mess in person.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2009, 09:54 AM   #10
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
Re: bigger role for Betts this year?

I'm cool with more of a Portis/Betts sharing the load arrangement. Betts is good in bursts (say that 5 times fast) but he has to work on ball security. I know his fumbles per carry ratio is similar to Portis but his fumbles seem to come at killer times.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!

Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2009, 09:59 AM   #11
saden1
MVP
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
Re: bigger role for Betts this year?

Hopefully his role will be cheering on the sideline 95% of the time and relieving Portis for a breathing spell the other 5% of the time.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder."

-Jenkins
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2009, 10:10 AM   #12
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,846
Re: bigger role for Betts this year?

On a good day I'd like to see Betts get at least 10 carries. Let him play a couple of series in a row to get in a groove. I'd rather see a healthy Portis at the end of the year with 1200 yards than a totally gassed Portis with 1500 yards. Come playoff time a broken down CP is going to be worthless.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2009, 10:39 AM   #13
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: bigger role for Betts this year?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
On a good day I'd like to see Betts get at least 10 carries. Let him play a couple of series in a row to get in a groove. I'd rather see a healthy Portis at the end of the year with 1200 yards than a totally gassed Portis with 1500 yards. Come playoff time a broken down CP is going to be worthless.
This is one key to the success of the season IMO. I would like to see Portis rest a good deal in the first half most games, and like you've said Matty (along w/ others) Betts is at his best when he gets several carries in a row. I say give Betts the 2nd Qtr or something like that if we're rolling along.

...one other thing i wonder is if a more complete integration into WCO will favor betts. Personally I like to see him catch the ball out of the backfield over CP...this is one area where I think Ladell punishes defenders.
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2009, 06:37 PM   #14
Pocket$ $traight
Registered User
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 49
Posts: 4,261
Re: bigger role for Betts this year?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
On a good day I'd like to see Betts get at least 10 carries. Let him play a couple of series in a row to get in a groove. I'd rather see a healthy Portis at the end of the year with 1200 yards than a totally gassed Portis with 1500 yards. Come playoff time a broken down CP is going to be worthless.
Portis is going to complain about his role no matter what so the coach needs to force a lighter workload upon him and ignore the drama.

Betts just needs to hold onto the ball. I don't know how you find ways to get him the ball at less important junctures of the game because he always seems to find the worst possible moment to fumble.

I like the idea of giving Betts a full series or two because judging him on spot duty isn't fair to him.
Pocket$ $traight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2009, 12:01 PM   #15
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,453
Re: bigger role for Betts this year?

they're not even in pads. let's see if smith says the same thing when betts gets hit and fumbles. i like betts, always have but it's ota's. i don't care about anything until pads are on.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.70688 seconds with 10 queries