Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum


2013 PFF Offensive Line Rankings

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-14-2014, 11:44 AM   #16
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 41
Posts: 17,511
Re: 2013 PFF Offensive Line Rankings

good news is there are a lot of upgrade OTs available... but nothing at OG. might have to try the draft there.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 01-14-2014, 12:01 PM   #17
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 33,992
Re: 2013 PFF Offensive Line Rankings

Quote:
Originally Posted by SirLK26 View Post
Exactly. The left side is solid, thanks to Williams. But the right side of the line never formed into a pocket, thanks to Chester and Polumbus. Does anyone have that GIF of Polumbus backing up as soon as the ball is snapped?

Breaking Down What Makes Tyler Polumbus the NFL's Worst Starter | Bleacher Report
bleacher report spot on, amazingly. Folks Polumbus sux
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2014, 12:28 PM   #18
Bucket
Playmaker
 
Bucket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Martinsburg, WV
Posts: 3,881
Re: 2013 PFF Offensive Line Rankings

Quote:
Originally Posted by NC_Skins View Post
..or a QB that scanned only 1/2 of the field. Some professionals analyzed game tape, and even cooley said this about him.
See, and that's the point. That is how the offense worked. The routes were consolidated so that his reads were close to each other on half the field. This is due to a lot of reasons.

It was the scheme.. In the long run, it was a offense built to abuse RG3's abilities and never progress him. Just used to win now, but once defenses caught on there was no plan B.
__________________
I need something to cheer about
Redskin Fan since '88
Be friends on Twitter! @thecasualhero
Bucket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2014, 12:52 PM   #19
jamf
Pro Bowl
 
jamf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,183
Re: 2013 PFF Offensive Line Rankings

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evilgrin View Post
Agreed, you have to be real careful with PFF rankings sometimes. I generally agree with the way they grade players though. Scheme, pistol, alot of things were done, but the line was never meant for pass pro. The interior is the problem, the edges of the line are elite or good enough. They should sacrifice some mobility and go for more size and strength IMO. I doubt it affects Morris at all, he is great with contact anyways. The other thing is we struggle blocking outside of the pocket area, WRs and TEs this year. As we've seen on film, one missed blocked from a WR or TE can ruin a play. The assignments get so complicated, and that is another knock on Shanahan, too much thinking.
I am shocked someone agrees with me!
when I post something at 5AM it's usually garbage.
jamf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2014, 12:57 PM   #20
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: 2013 PFF Offensive Line Rankings

Quote:
Originally Posted by That Guy View Post
good news is there are a lot of upgrade OTs available... but nothing at OG. might have to try the draft there.
Zane Beadles might become free and would be an upgrade.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2014, 01:53 PM   #21
KI Skins Fan
Pro Bowl
 
KI Skins Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jacksonville, Forida
Posts: 6,317
Re: 2013 PFF Offensive Line Rankings

Quote:
Originally Posted by mredskins View Post
It is going tbe interesting to see if Alfmo is good because of Alfmo or MS's zone blocking next year.
Are you kidding me? You still don't see Alfmo's talent? Well, I'm not going to argue the point with you because it's senseless.

If there is any player on this team whose production we don't need to worry about, it's Alfmo. If you can't see that, just believe the rest of us.
__________________
RAISE HAIL!
KI Skins Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2014, 02:15 PM   #22
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 41
Posts: 17,511
Re: 2013 PFF Offensive Line Rankings

yeah, gee. i guess now that the shanny zone blocking is gone, morris is going to forget how to break tackles or make good reads.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2014, 02:16 PM   #23
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 44
Posts: 12,416
Re: 2013 PFF Offensive Line Rankings

The problem with these rankings are they're based on what happened, not what the line is capable of. If the line weren't so shitty the play design could have been vastly different.

Not saying Griffin and others don't share blame. But this line is a huge reason we couldn't do more.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.
Schneed10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2014, 03:40 PM   #24
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 10,164
Re: 2013 PFF Offensive Line Rankings

IT also seems to ignore the fact the the pocket routinely collapsed. I mean rarely was Rob able to take a drop without one or more linemen getting pushed back up on him.
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2014, 03:41 PM   #25
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 10,164
Re: 2013 PFF Offensive Line Rankings

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Gruden likes zone schemes too, but he favors the inside zone running. Morris should be fine.
I think he might fit better on the inside stuff too.
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2014, 04:33 PM   #26
celts32
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 52
Posts: 2,665
Re: 2013 PFF Offensive Line Rankings

PFF is a joke.
__________________
Section 116 Row 19

“Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.”

www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub
celts32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2014, 06:59 PM   #27
bigm29
Special Teams
 
bigm29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Mt. Laurel, NJ
Age: 36
Posts: 353
Re: 2013 PFF Offensive Line Rankings

Say what you want about the pass protection, personally I feel RG3 had plenty of time on most plays. But you also have to consider the success of Alfred Morris, which is directly the result of a good offensive line. With pass protection, the receivers didn't help much either I know (I think because of poor play design/choice). But RG3 needs to improve more.

I feel the best way to help RG3 is to give him a defense. If we could hold teams to under 20 points like good teams do, he wouldn't have to put his body on the line every single game. We could also run the ball more effectively too which takes more pressure off of him.

Here is another stat from PFF which shows that we had the worst pass rush in the entire league through November. https://www.profootballfocus.com/blo...am-defenses/2/

I am glad the Shanahans are gone and I hope Hazz is gone too. Hopefully this will be a good change for the team and Gruden can coach up RG3. Not having to rehab will also help him tremendously for next season.

Bottom line: Fixing our defense NEEDS to be the #1 priority this off-season. I can deal with our offensive line and I think Griffin will improve on his own.
__________________
Hail Redskins!!!

Last edited by bigm29; 01-14-2014 at 07:00 PM. Reason: forgot link
bigm29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2014, 08:10 PM   #28
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 41
Posts: 17,511
Re: 2013 PFF Offensive Line Rankings

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ol

FO says we're 23rd, and that morris is pretty good. we also run left 40%, right 27% and inside the rest. that points to a weak right side, and the stuff rate on runs is bad for us. still #4 in power success (3rd/4th/goal and 2 yards or less to go).

i think that's a much better analysis than PFF.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2014, 10:49 AM   #29
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: 2013 PFF Offensive Line Rankings

It's hard to be the third best line in the league with so many below average parts. But having Trent Williams makes everybody elses job easier. And Polumbus' improvement was legitimate to a degree.

The receivers deserve a lot of criticism for some of the hits Griffin took this year though. A lot of weak routes, getting physically dominated, and at times, outright laziness. All of those factors will force a quarterback to hold the ball.

And other times, RG3 just didn't see the play developing as it was practiced.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2014, 11:19 AM   #30
skinsguy
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
Re: 2013 PFF Offensive Line Rankings

I will concede that the offensive line seemed to do fairly well with the zone blocking schemes for running plays, but I saw a lot of horrid plays on that right side of the line during passing plays.

This article still doesn't excuse the fact that this OL needs major upgrades.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!"
skinsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.08156 seconds with 10 queries