Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum


Diehardskin's Theory of the 2010 Redskins

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-20-2009, 06:45 PM   #16
vallin21
The Starter
 
vallin21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,173
Re: Diehardskin's Theory of the 2010 Redskins

I see Shanahan keeping JC, maybe pursuing Marshall (RFA), drafting an OL, RB, moving up to get a FS in the 3rd. Remember, Marshall was the 4th round pick in '06 we traded in order to get JC in '05, and Marshall has respect for Shanahan and knows Synder will pay him some heavy coin.
vallin21 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 12-20-2009, 06:51 PM   #17
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 62
Posts: 10,672
Re: Diehardskin's Theory of the 2010 Redskins

you're kidding with the part about Rabach starting at guard, right? and why not Williams as the starting center?
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2009, 07:08 PM   #18
LandrySlice
Special Teams
 
LandrySlice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: AFGHANISTAN
Posts: 335
Re: Diehardskin's Theory of the 2010 Redskins

If we got Marshall, paried with Thomas, Moss, and the TE's, this offense would be so sweet, but you need o-line first so you have time to pass it to them. I am getting so excited about next year its crazy, but I feel this way every year! GOLLY!
__________________
Don't tase me bro!!!!
LandrySlice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2009, 07:24 PM   #19
vallin21
The Starter
 
vallin21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,173
Re: Diehardskin's Theory of the 2010 Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by LandrySlice View Post
If we got Marshall, paried with Thomas, Moss, and the TE's, this offense would be so sweet, but you need o-line first so you have time to pass it to them. I am getting so excited about next year its crazy, but I feel this way every year! GOLLY!
Yeah definetely agree with addressing the o-line first, but assuming Shanahan comes in, and if Marshall's available this is the perfect spot for him. An owner willing to shell out big contracts, and he's familar w/ Shanahans scheme. Marshall does have a "me first" but so did D-hall, but we need to shore up that O-line first.
vallin21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2009, 07:28 PM   #20
RiggoDrill
Camp Scrub
 
RiggoDrill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Annandale, VA
Posts: 59
Re: Diehardskin's Theory of the 2010 Redskins

I don't see the skins using a high draft pick on a RB if Shanny comes in as the coach. He has been very successful with late rounders and FA's in his plug-n-play running game.
A major rebuilding is in the works, and there are needs at every position, if not for starting talent then for depth.
I think Campbell stays for another year, maybe two.
__________________
"In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is freedom, in water there is bacteria." - Benjamin Franklin
RiggoDrill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2009, 07:40 PM   #21
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Diehardskin's Theory of the 2010 Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by LandrySlice View Post
If we got Marshall, paried with Thomas, Moss, and the TE's, this offense would be so sweet, but you need o-line first so you have time to pass it to them. I am getting so excited about next year its crazy, but I feel this way every year! GOLLY!
I don't see Marshall leaving Denver. He's got great rapport with Orton, and Pat Bowlen already indicated Marshall has a big raise coming. They'll lock him up long term.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2009, 08:30 PM   #22
Zerohero
Impact Rookie
 
Zerohero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: phoenix, az
Age: 45
Posts: 897
Re: Diehardskin's Theory of the 2010 Redskins

If we have a running back other than Portis next year starting we will already be ahead the game.
Zerohero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2009, 08:33 PM   #23
wolfeskins
The Starter
 
wolfeskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
Re: Diehardskin's Theory of the 2010 Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud View Post
Starting over with a rookie QB in a complex system like the WCO is not the way to go.
was cutler a starter his rookie year for shanny? if so, how did he do?
__________________
Hail to Allen/Shanahan .... bring in some baby hogs and load up on diesel fuel !!! (budw38)
wolfeskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2009, 09:21 PM   #24
CultBrennan59
Pro Bowl
 
CultBrennan59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
Re: Diehardskin's Theory of the 2010 Redskins

IF Mike Shanahan comes here, this is what I see happening.
-Our first pick will be a QB, because OLineman are rich in free agency especially guys who know shanahans system like mentioned before. I see us getting Sam Bradford.(If he's not available then I see us getting Okung from Oklahoma state, plus some other good OT's that are juniors are declaring this year so you know some will drop and we could get one with our second rounder)

-We make a play for Brandon Marshall for sure

-We bring in at least one offensive lineman (Logan Mankins, and Marcus McNeil are free agents)

-Portis is surprisingly kept because he knows Shanahans offense well and can teach Ganther and the RB we'll bring in through the draft (Betts is gone, possibly Cartwright)

-We also make a play for Keith Bulluck of the Titans, and Josh Cribbs for our poor return game

-Orakpo gets moved to DE, and Bob Slowik will probably be our DC after Blache retires

-Levi Jones is resigned and Rocky is signed to a long term deal. Dockery and Levi will most likely be the only guys from this current line who are on it next year. Rabach maybe gone, as well as heyer (or kept as a backup)

-Possible OL for next year Levi Jones, Dockery, Rabach?, Chris Kuper/Chester Pitts, Russell Okung
Jones, Dockery, Rabach?, Mike Iupati (rookie; Idaho), Tyson Clabo

-Antwaan Randel El, Randy Thomas, Chris Samuels, Philip Daniels, Cornelius Griffin, Fred Smoot, Todd Collins, and Justin Tryon gone. With Portis, Rabach, Moss, Cooley, Campbell?, Heyer, Fletcher?, Landry, Carter, Rogers all on the fence as to who stays/ goes/gets traded.
CultBrennan59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2009, 09:23 PM   #25
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: Diehardskin's Theory of the 2010 Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zerohero View Post
If we have a running back other than Portis next year starting we will already be ahead the game.
If we have a healthy RB next year we are ahead of the game.
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2009, 09:24 PM   #26
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: Diehardskin's Theory of the 2010 Redskins

We will win the Super Bowl if we sign Pacman Jones.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2009, 09:30 PM   #27
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 62
Posts: 10,672
Re: Diehardskin's Theory of the 2010 Redskins

no way Shanahan brings Marshall here. there were reports that he was ready to cut him, but he got fired instead. tired of his antics
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2009, 09:31 PM   #28
mlmdub130
Playmaker
 
mlmdub130's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 3,238
Re: Diehardskin's Theory of the 2010 Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
We will win the Super Bowl if we sign Pacman Jones.
i actually had a conversation about him with a friend, and i know it will probaly get shot down, but i thought it wouldn't have been that bad for us to bring him into camp, or atleast try, just pay him dirt and if he does anything wrong kick him out, i think he would have been a better option than anyone we have beside los smoot and hall
__________________
"I don't think anybody should have regrets, especially me, ... You don't regret what you do in your life. If you do it, you do it for a reason."

ST21
mlmdub130 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2009, 09:33 PM   #29
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,221
Re: Diehardskin's Theory of the 2010 Redskins

Are people with all these theories taking into consideration how some free agents are going to be RFAs with the uncapped year? Just asking because many sites that have list of free agents don't have this information. I think Yahoo Sports has a list of UFAs and RFAs based on an uncapped year.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2009, 11:46 PM   #30
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Diehardskin's Theory of the 2010 Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by wolfeskins View Post
was cutler a starter his rookie year for shanny? if so, how did he do?
Cutler started 5 games his rookie year at the end of the season. He had 9 tds and 7 turnovers and had a rating of 82.5. Can't really take much from that.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.07933 seconds with 10 queries