The Most Fresh & Cordial Political Thread Ever

[nonniey]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

Trump is a shithead. Won't get any argument from me there. But Biden is a terrible president now and will be in 2024. Voting for him is not the answer (neither is Trump). And I personally don't believe for a second, he gives 1 shit about the constitution.

Maybe not but as Baltimore pointed out he operates within the constitutions confines. Trump doesn't which makes him an enemy of that document.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by nonniey

The point is raising the cap does little to extend the solvency. The CBO showed you have to adjust the benefits if you really want to fix it long term. People are living longer, much longer than when SS was first implemented. Raising the age to receive the max retirement benefit for those that are currently young made the most sense.

Obviously raising the cap alone doesn't solve everything, but it's part of it along with possibly raising the full retirement age (it's already been slowing creeping up), modifying the benefit formula and/or making it means tested.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

People like Behar simply don't want minorities to be successful imo. And especially don't want them to be successful and conservative. Doesn't help them make money or keep power.

LOL, people who believe that are racist themselves. IMO.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by nonniey

Good grief spouting stuff you know isn't true, and that you know everyone in this forum (left and right) knows that you know isn't true.

Yet , you let chico and others post as much BS as they want.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Yet , you let chico and others post as much BS as they want.

The struggle is real for g1



“Chico”

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

The struggle is real for g1

“Chico”

Just making it real for trumpetts like yourself.

[nonniey]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Yet , you let chico and others post as much BS as they want.

Then you don't really pay attention to what is being posted here or have an extremely short memory (extremely short!).

[sdskinsfan2001]

The whole Surpreme Court is MAGA now. Lolol.

Schumer rips 'MAGA' Supreme Court after 9-0 vote on EPA waters rule

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/sch...pa-waters-rule

What a whiny little bitch.

[Chico23231]

Your typical Reddit psychopath, instead of consulting a doctor or therapist is on website seeking help from strangers. While forcing their child into chemical castration because they are sick in the fucking head…while obviously they don’t

People should be strung up

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

The whole Surpreme Court is MAGA now. Lolol.

Schumer rips 'MAGA' Supreme Court after 9-0 vote on EPA waters rule

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/sch...pa-waters-rule

What a whiny little bitch.

trump said he overturned Roe V Wade so Schumer is right.

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by Giantone

trump said he overturned Roe V Wade so Schumer is right.

[BaltimoreSkins]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

The whole Surpreme Court is MAGA now. Lolol.

Schumer rips 'MAGA' Supreme Court after 9-0 vote on EPA waters rule

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/sch...pa-waters-rule

What a whiny little bitch.

This was a very depressing ruling. That favors developers over clean water, storm surge protection. We have already drained and filled 90% of all wetlands in the United States it is not radical to want to conserve 10%. What is radical is allowing the filling of it all. The intentionally vague language of continuous surface connection to major bodies of water are going to lead to more exploitation and the cancerous ideology of this county.

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by BaltimoreSkins

This was a very depressing ruling. That favors developers over clean water, storm surge protection. We have already drained and filled 90% of all wetlands in the United States it is not radical to want to conserve 10%

I have no problem disagreeing with the ruling. But it was 9-0. The simple default to just labeling everything MAGA when it doesn't go your way is lazy at best. But really, it's just being a piece of shit lying scumbag, a Schumer specialty.

[BaltimoreSkins]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

I have no problem disagreeing with the ruling. But it was 9-0. The simple default to just labeling everything MAGA when it doesn't go your way is lazy at best. But really, it's just being a piece of shit lying scumbag, a Schumer specialty.

It is lazy. Agreed. 9-0 only tells me rich powerful people with friends in the real estate industry hate poor people in their way. Got to grow grow grow

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by BaltimoreSkins

It is lazy. Agreed. 9-0 only tells me rich powerful people with friends in the real estate industry hate poor people in their way. Got to grow grow grow

I don't think anything has proven to be more true than this.