QB or BPA for our #1 Draft Pick - 2020

[mooby]

Originally Posted by OmahaRedskins

We should have changed to a 4 - 3 years ago. I never though we had the proper players for a 3 - 4.

It's been 10 years and we've never had legit personnel for a 3-4. This move is long overdue.

I can't understand how a d-line of Ioannidis, Payne, and Allen has been so ineffective against the run. Does Manusky ask them to eat up blockers so the linebackers can make plays like a true 3-4? Are the linebackers not good enough? I'm not smart enough to figure out why we've never been able to make it work but it's been a decade+ since we had a good defense.

[EdmundDorf]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

Rumor has it the defense will switch to 4-3 making some players expendable in addition to TW and Kerrigan. We can get some picks by trading these players.

What rumour is this...... do prospective HCs have a prfeerence for 4-3 alignment?

[EdmundDorf]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

I personally feel we need to trade down if we get the right deal. We can address a lot of needs if lets say Miami wanted to come up and get Tua.

This would seem to be the main/only chance of trading down given Miami's 3 1st rounders and that Tua is the only prospect work such a trade assuming he is fit and well... unless Cincinnati screws up the first pick.... that sort of haul would only be achieved if a franchise passer is available..... don't bet your house on a trade down

[VTSkins1961]

Originally Posted by EdmundDorf

This would seem to be the main/only chance of trading down given Miami's 3 1st rounders and that Tua is the only prospect work such a trade assuming he is fit and well... unless Cincinnati screws up the first pick.... that sort of haul would only be achieved if a franchise passer is available..... don't bet your house on a trade down

If the Bengals don't take Burrows the Redskins should take him in a heartbeat and trade Haskins. This isn't a knock on Haskins but Burrows looks like the real deal...... In any case teh new coach and GM will have to decide if Haskins is the long term QB

[MTK]

Originally Posted by VTSkins1961

If the Bengals don't take Burrows the Redskins should take him in a heartbeat and trade Haskins. This isn't a knock on Haskins but Burrows looks like the real deal...... In any case teh new coach and GM will have to decide if Haskins is the long term QB

Zero chance the Bengals pass on Burrow



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[romeojr]

If you're truly confused on what the Redskins should do with the 2nd pick in the Draft, it's a pretty simple observation to make: Nick Bosa.

He is the night & day difference for the 49ers' defense this year,...which allowed time for Jimmy G to have a slow start on the season, then get his feet wet and have a successful year.

It's really an open and shut case as far as the #2 pick: You pick the BPA,..and that will be Chase Young.

Just like last year with Arizona,...the Bengals are extremely desperate for a top flight playercaller at the most valuable position,...which opens the door for the Redskins to take the best player in the draft.

You only do your due diligence with everyone else simply crazy things do happen between here and April, and you do have more picks to make in the draft anyway.

[skinsfaninok]

If the Bengals pass on Burrow we will have a kings ransom for that pick

[Skinsfanatic]

Ehhh, Lions are choking this away anyways.

[CRedskinsRule]

Oops wrong stat

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

[Warthog]

We are #2 in the draft. It appears that either Rivera or Lewis are going to be the HC and probably in charge of this years draft. Since both these Coaches are defensively oriented it makes sense that they may think about Chase Young.

I see it either being Chase Young or trade down for a boatload of picks to fill our many holes. It may depend on whether teams offer a king’s ransom that we can’t ignore.

I also see if we make trades of older FA like Trent Williams and Kerrigan for draft picks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Irrefutable]

Young is not Bosa, Young disappeared the last two games. Trade the #2 for picks.

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by Irrefutable

Young is not Bosa, Young disappeared the last two games. Trade the #2 for picks.

Sure.

[DYoungJelly]

Originally Posted by Irrefutable

Young is not Bosa, Young disappeared the last two games. Trade the #2 for picks.

Remember when we dominated the raiders a few years ago?

What does that say about Kalil Mack? The answer is nothing.

How many times was young double teamed, or otherwise taken out of the play by scheming around his responsibility?

Are you basing that on the stat line or because you watched film with a member of the coaching staff, or something in between?

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

[Irrefutable]

Originally Posted by DYoungJelly

Remember when we dominated the raiders a few years ago?

What does that say about Kalil Mack? The answer is nothing.

How many times was young double teamed, or otherwise taken out of the play by scheming around his responsibility?

Are you basing that on the stat line or because you watched film with a member of the coaching staff, or something in between?

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Young is a good player, however, you need to get a great player at #2. Yes, I have watched videos with a member of the coaching staff. We could not find any film on Young. Where are all the "experts" who said the D-line would be great with Allen, Payne, Kerrigan, and Matt I?

One player is not going to turn everything around....no second-round pick too, and plenty of holes to fill.

[OmahaRedskins]

Chase Young is a no brainier. You take him and run, unless you get a RG 3 type deal. You do not over complicate it, you turn the card in and take the best player.