Media Bias

[MTK]

Trump isn’t exactly a smooth talker so I’m sure his delivery was the problem. Plus not knowing the soldier’s name probably isn’t a good look.

[MTK]

If you’re listening to anyone other than yourself as far as how to live and vote point and laugh at yourself.

[mooby]

Originally Posted by MTK

If you’re listening to anyone other than yourself as far as how to live and vote point and laugh at yourself.

Seriously. Celebrities and any other 1% are so out of touch with reality why would you listen to them in the first place? Their existence is nothing like ours.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by mooby

Seriously. Celebrities and any other 1% are so out of touch with reality why would you listen to them in the first place? Their existence is nothing like ours.

I am not disagreeing just saying you need to add our political leaders to that list.

[mooby]

Originally Posted by Giantone

I am not disagreeing just saying you need to add out political leaders to that list.

I did, "any other 1%er" covers any of the top 1% of earners in this country. That includes CEO's, politicians, etc.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by MTK

If you’re listening to anyone other than yourself as far as how to live and vote point and laugh at yourself.

truth...

[CRedskinsRule]

The president is not the one who politicized the family's grief.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

The president is not the one who politicized the family's grief.

He is the one that made false statements about other Presidents,"Anger sparked by President Trump’s false claims on Monday that Barack Obama and other past presidents did not reach out to families of fallen American troops swelled into the night."


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.6b605cfabdf1

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

The president is not the one who politicized the family's grief.

Bingo

[mooby]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

The president is not the one who politicized the family's grief.

Can we just agree the President and the Congresswoman are both morons and move on to better subjects, like El Presidente personally interviewing applicants for the federal attorney's position in Manhattan, who would be in charge of bringing indictments against the President if this Russia investigation actually has credibility?

[Chico23231]

Rachel Maddow called out by fellow liberals for pushing anti-Trump conspiracy | Fox News

Huffington post calling out Maddow conspiracy theory. Good too see those on one side are actually thinking and not consuming batshit crazy as any type of factual reporting.

[mooby]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Rachel Maddow called out by fellow liberals for pushing anti-Trump conspiracy | Fox News

Huffington post calling out Maddow conspiracy theory. Good too see those on one side are actually thinking and not consuming batshit crazy as any type of factual reporting.

Nothing? No response to my post? Chico we're not going to get anywhere if you just keep listening to idiot media talking heads spout idiotic media theories that get people to tune in. You're as bad as the "triggered left." The goal is viewership/clicks. That brings money in, which keeps the machine turning. We've been over this. You keep tuning in, which feeds the beast. Meanwhile, nobody has heard shit or gives a shit about actual things like Trump personally trying to hire the guy that could (read: won't) bring charges against him.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by mooby

Nothing? No response to my post? Chico we're not going to get anywhere if you just keep listening to idiot media talking heads spout idiotic media theories that get people to tune in. You're as bad as the "triggered left." The goal is viewership/clicks. That brings money in, which keeps the machine turning. We've been over this. You keep tuning in, which feeds the beast. Meanwhile, nobody has heard shit or gives a shit about actual things like Trump personally trying to hire the guy that could (read: won't) bring charges against him.

I hear what you are saying mooby, and even agree that it raises a question of impropriety.

That said it is a fact that all the US attorneys serve as part of the executive branch, and are nominated by the president. And approved by the Senate. I am a bit shocked to learn that the president or Attorney General dont as a matter of course interview those who are nominated for these positions, given that there are only about 90 in the whole country and serve a unique and important role in our government.

[mooby]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

I hear what you are saying mooby, and even agree that it raises a question of impropriety.

That said it is a fact that all the US attorneys serve as part of the executive branch, and are nominated by the president. And approved by the Senate. I am a bit shocked to learn that the president or Attorney General dont as a matter of course interview those who are nominated for these positions, given that there are only about 90 in the whole country and serve a unique and important role in our government.

You're right, it is a fact. However, you would think the Justice Dept. would handle the hiring of federal attorneys, seeing as how they're the ones that have done it since forever. Trump is the first President to actually conduct the interview process for that job.

Seriously if Obama was the one doing this the right would be screaming collusion, and we would be the ones accused of sitting by ignoring it.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by mooby

Nothing? No response to my post? Chico we're not going to get anywhere if you just keep listening to idiot media talking heads spout idiotic media theories that get people to tune in. You're as bad as the "triggered left." The goal is viewership/clicks. That brings money in, which keeps the machine turning. We've been over this. You keep tuning in, which feeds the beast. Meanwhile, nobody has heard shit or gives a shit about actual things like Trump personally trying to hire the guy that could (read: won't) bring charges against him.

Bingo!