The hypocrisy of the ________

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by sunnyside

prius drivers.

Look, i get it. It’s pretty cool you can drive around and have that big dashboard thing live tracking your miles per gallon. It’s like a video game trying to get to your destination averaging more than 35 miles per gallon. Coast down hills and towards red lights, only use the gas pedal when absolutely needed.

I get it. I rented a prius once and it was pretty cool trying to score the highest mpg i could. If i had a fleet of 4 cars, one would probably be a prius.

But get the fuck out of the left lane with your coasting, tepid use of the gas pedal, going the speed limit in the fast lane bullshit. I will ride your fucking ass with my middle finger up. I will go 55 mph right next to you mouthing the words “fuck you and die slow bitch”.
So please get the fuck out of the fast lane if you are playing the “how many miles can i get per gallon” game.

amen!!!!!

[MTK]

60,000 dead and he's trying to spin it as a win

[Chico23231]

The responses to Tara reade by Elizabeth Warren and others is laughable. First it was believe all woman...funny how that’s changed. The treatment of Kavenaugh looms large now

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

The responses to Tara reade by Elizabeth Warren and others is laughable. First it was believe all woman...funny how that’s changed. The treatment of Kavenaugh looms large now

Oh , look , chico disagrees ,..............some one call MSM!!!

[SunnySide]

After reading up on this, apparently this is the time line.

1993 - she said she was told by someone that Biden wanted her to help serve drinks at a function because he thought she had nice legs. She refused and she claims she was subsequently overlooked for other jobs.

2019 - she says Biden touched her shoulder and neck and it made her feel uncomfortable.

2020 - she says that he pushed her against a wall and put his hands up her skirt.

I’m not making any opinions as to veracity but this is the timeline of the complaints as I understand them from what I have read.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by SunnySide

After reading up on this, apparently this is the time line.

1993 - she said she was told by someone that Biden wanted her to help serve drinks at a function because he thought she had nice legs. She refused and she claims she was subsequently overlooked for other jobs.

2019 - she says Biden touched her shoulder and neck and it made her feel uncomfortable.

2020 - she says that he pushed her against a wall and put his hands up her skirt.

I’m not making any opinions as to veracity but this is the timeline of the complaints as I understand them from what I have read.

Forbes has a timeline now that’s shows the interecpt’s report along with Business Insider report were up to 6-7 people can corroborate reader’s story when it happened then and details.

IM not saying it right or wrong...I don’t know. Just the treatment of the Kavenaugh story where 700 articles were written within the first week with no investigation, no evidence or people who could corroborate...nobody in fact never came forward to corroborate Ford’s account. But the coverage then was a to smear Kavenaugh and to believe all woman without evidence.

We can easily see the coverage now with much more evidence...it’s to dismiss reade and not believe all woman.

[sdskinsfan2001]

I'm sorry, but if we are not going to admit to the hypocrisy in the way this is being covered and the way Kavanaugh was covered, we might as well just shut down all of the political threads, because there is no point. Admitting the hypocrisy doesn't mean you're admitting Biden is guilty. That's a separate matter, and one I don't care to discuss. Hopefully he gets due process and can clear his name (if he is innocent) and if she's lying she is punished accordingly (although no one seems to get in trouble for lying for some stupid reason). But the coverage and hollywood outrage is night and day.

How it looks from my side (not from people here, from most media coverage): Believe all women no matter what, if the accused is a republican (the accused is automatically guilty). If a democrat, she needs to prove her case, and the accused is innocent until proven guilty (this is how it should be handled, for everyone).

[sdskinsfan2001]

I'll see myself back out. I imagine by the time I wake up tomorrow, I'm going to regret saying anything.

[Giantone]

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...s-his-n1131841


https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...ments-evidence


https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politic...trump-recapped


Republicans ignored them all before ,correct?

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by Giantone

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...s-his-n1131841


https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...ments-evidence

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politic...trump-recapped

Republicans ignored them all before ,correct?

You are literally incapable of having honest dialogue. Anytime someone post something you don't agree with, you ignore that post completely, and post somewhere between 1 and 100 posts about other things, while ignoring the original point. I'm actually dumbfounded you're 50ish+. Grow the fuck up. Also Giants suck!!! I'd wager to bet that even people that are clearly more on the left here just let you be absurd to not have to deal with your non sense.

Even if you argued more on my side I'd trade you immediately for a 7th round flyer. You are either a phony or liar.

[sdskinsfan2001]

Giantone basically hijacks all Warpath threads that discuss politics. Redskins are the better franchise and obviously have the better fan site. Can't you go ruin their website? Eli must have banhammereed you. Probably talked about the Redskins too much.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

.................................................. ............................ I'm actually dumbfounded you're 50ish+. Grow the fuck up. Also Giants suck!!! I'd wager to bet that even people that are clearly more on the left here just let you be absurd to not have to deal with your non sense.

................... you're needed at the drive thru...................

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

I'll see myself back out. I imagine by the time I wake up tomorrow, I'm going to regret saying anything.

.............so are we.

[SunnySide]

After reiterating the allegations against Biden, Carlson said, “But there is evidence on the other side as well, and we feel honor-bound to tell you about it. Just last year, Tara Reade told a very different story about what happened with Joe Biden. In 2019, she said he touched her inappropriately on the neck and shoulders. She said not that she was fired for complaining about harassment, much less being penetrated by Joe Biden. She then said she was fired because she refused to serve drinks at an event.”

Carlson then pointed out that Reade was a Bernie Sanders supporter, and questioned the timing and motive behind her allegations against Biden.

There’s the question of Reade’s politics,” Carlson said. “We normally wouldn’t get into that because it’s not germane. But keep in mind this story is unfolding during a presidential campaign. And it’s also playing out against the backdrop of fierce infighting within the Democratic Party.” Carlson later went on to add, “It’s notable that before Joe Biden started beating Bernie Sanders in the primary, Tara Reade wasn’t attacking Joe Biden, instead she had effusively positive things to say about him. In 2017, Tara Reade repeatedly praised Joe Biden for his work against sexual assault.”

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/...081305195.html

I think one objective difference is that kavanuagh was going through a SCOTUS vetting process with hearings which allowed a large visible platform for his accusers vs Reid who has only done a handful of interviews and there are no vetting or investigative hearings going on re Biden.

I don’t know where sdskinsfan stands re the Kavanaugh’s accusers but ... I would imagine any conservative who didn’t believe kavanaughs accuser bc her accusation was decades later or she didn’t know specificities ... then now can’t claim with a straight face the Reid accusation must be taken seriously.

Shouldn’t the conservatives who blank dismissed kavanaughs accuser now must dismiss Biden accuser?

Wouldn’t that be ironic, don’t ya think?

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by SunnySide

After reiterating the allegations against Biden, Carlson said, “But there is evidence on the other side as well, and we feel honor-bound to tell you about it. Just last year, Tara Reade told a very different story about what happened with Joe Biden. In 2019, she said he touched her inappropriately on the neck and shoulders. She said not that she was fired for complaining about harassment, much less being penetrated by Joe Biden. She then said she was fired because she refused to serve drinks at an event.”

Carlson then pointed out that Reade was a Bernie Sanders supporter, and questioned the timing and motive behind her allegations against Biden.

There’s the question of Reade’s politics,” Carlson said. “We normally wouldn’t get into that because it’s not germane. But keep in mind this story is unfolding during a presidential campaign. And it’s also playing out against the backdrop of fierce infighting within the Democratic Party.” Carlson later went on to add, “It’s notable that before Joe Biden started beating Bernie Sanders in the primary, Tara Reade wasn’t attacking Joe Biden, instead she had effusively positive things to say about him. In 2017, Tara Reade repeatedly praised Joe Biden for his work against sexual assault.”

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/...081305195.html

I think one objective difference is that kavanuagh was going through a SCOTUS vetting process with hearings which allowed a large visible platform for his accusers vs Reid who has only done a handful of interviews and there are no vetting or investigative hearings going on re Biden.

I don’t know where sdskinsfan stands re the Kavanaugh’s accusers but ... I would imagine any conservative who didn’t believe kavanaughs accuser bc her accusation was decades later or she didn’t know specificities ... then now can’t claim with a straight face the Reid accusation must be taken seriously.

Shouldn’t the conservatives who blank dismissed kavanaughs accuser now must dismiss Biden accuser?

Wouldn’t that be ironic, don’t ya think?

Its not about belief or not. I get absolutely zero benefit/enjoyment out of what Biden is going thru. I wouldn't wish sexual harassment charges on anyone, without proof of guilt. I didn't dismiss Kavanaugh accusers. I also didn't just take the ball and run with it with hearsay evidence. Kavanaugh was guilty immediately. These same people that said believe all women, which means the men they accuse are automatically guilty, are no where to be found with Biden. Do we believe all women or not? If so, then the same way Kavanaugh shouldn't have been confirmed, Biden needs to drop out of the race. Or does the political views of the accused become the determining factor? Sure looks to be the latter.

It's about the assumed guilt 1 person dealt with, vs. the assumed innocence Biden gets. It's not been handled the same same and its clear as day why. Accusations against someone should be handled way closer to how it being handled for Biden, than how it was handled for Kavanaugh, for everyone. But that's not the case.

I think everyone can see the difference. Whether people will admit it or not, thats another conversation.