Trayvon Martin Case

[RedskinRat]

Originally Posted by skinsguy

Let me say this again, because I don't think you were able to grasp the concept.

I didn't agree with you, it's hardly the same as 'not getting it'.

Originally Posted by skinsguy

The programmer's only source of data to use for such a program would be prior trial outcomes, convictions or what not.

Oh, boy......

Originally Posted by skinsguy

Realistically, where else do you think he or she is going to get the data? A programmer is not trained to be a judge, he or she is trained to be a computer programmer; therefore, it does not matter the bias of the programmer. Law is not simply "If variable Outcomes = Array[1], then Boolean variable = True, otherwise false." Simply saying, person A shot and killed person B, therefore person A is guilty. It would be much more complicated than that, and I am afraid that you're on the borderline of thinking in fantasy world rather than realistic logic.

This would be funny if you were intentionally trying to amuse me. You're serious.....holy crap. Do you know what a qubit is?

Originally Posted by skinsguy

A computer only does what the programmer and or end user tells it to do. This is fact. A computer cannot think for itself. It must follow a list of commands. Please think in terms of real life, not Star Trek.

So why are you suggesting the computer would think for itself? Hold tight, it's almost here.

Originally Posted by skinsguy

Programmers get paid to program, not to become legal judges.

That makes no sense, we wouldn't be asking them to.

Originally Posted by skinsguy

No. Over time, the program would continue to use the same criteria that the programmer hard coded into the system. The computer does not suddenly decide that it no longer needs criteria previously built in its arrays and decides it's going to break out on its own.

It would if it were programmed to.

Originally Posted by skinsguy

Either the programmer or someone else, would have to decide that the data should be replaced by outcomes saved into new databases, which would still need the use of a human response determining what is accurate data and what is not.

How about a judicial committee?

Originally Posted by skinsguy

A computer cannot determine it, it can only determine data based on the commands it was told to perform. Nothing more and nothing less.

Therefore a computer could determine 'it'.