![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,420
|
Re: Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?
Does anyone remember a running back by the name of Stephen Davis when we had Terry Allen??? When Allen left, everyone thought that Skip Hicks would be our stud (another scat back)... now... what type of career did Stephen Davis have, and what ever happened to Skip Hicks???
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 47
Posts: 1,319
|
Re: Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?
Quote:
And comparing Stephen Davis to Betts is a bit of a stretch too, considering Davis wasn't allergic to touchdowns. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,420
|
Re: Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?
Quote:
Please tell me people's memories are not so short to remember how lowly we thought of Davis in the early days. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 47
Posts: 1,319
|
Re: Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?
Quote:
And Betts isn't exactly in his "early" days. He's been in the league for six years now, which means over half his career is over. Running backs aren't really known for 10+ year careers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,420
|
Re: Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Union, NJ
Age: 46
Posts: 72
|
Re: Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?
I think that Portis should get more carries. Betts is OK but he's more of screen pass type of guy to me. He has shown the ability in the past but I think Portis is the guy unless he's hurting or needs a breather.
No matter what Sellers is the ONLY option in short yardage and goaline situations. Did you see his carry 3 linebackers into the endzone?? Makes me really pissed off that Betts got the call against the G-men...... |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,555
|
Re: Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?
Quote:
__________________
It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 3,109
|
Re: Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?
Quote:
Bottom line: Portis blocks better and runs harder. Betts is a great change of pace back, he's about as powerful as Ki Jana Carter... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 3,109
|
Re: Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?
I really like the way the two guys are working right now more because Portis is staying fresh and he's staying relatively healthy. He hasn't been healthy since last preseason and he's still playing well. I like getting Betts in there to keep Portis fresh, however, I can't accept an argument that Portis (the toughest back they've had since Davis) is somehow a scat back who can't run north south. He's the best north south runner on the team beyond Sellers. Portis is a great back and Betts is a good backup. That's where it ends. This shouldn't be a Portis v. Betts thing, but apparently it has to continue to turn into it.
I've been pleased with what I've seen, more because of W's than because of any overwhelming effectiveness. Portis is playing pretty well, Betts isn't right now. As the season wears on, everyone will be happy the Skins have them both. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 877
|
Re: Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?
Hasn't everyone here daydreamed about if we still had Davis in his prime when Gibbs came back???? Ahhhh....what might have been.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 47
Posts: 1,319
|
Re: Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?
Uhhh... Portis broke Davis' rushing record under Gibbs. And what would it have mattered? The quarterback situation was still a mess when Gibbs came back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,592
|
Re: Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?
Im not even gonna get into this squabble because anyone that doesn't see Portis' talent or the amount of heart he has simply doesn't know what the F they are talking about. I am glad to see people come to his defense. He is by fr my favorite player in the NFL. Noone seems to play with as much passion and love for the game as him (ok, maybe Brett Favre). I hope he is here for years to come, and I hope to one day see his name and # hung up in the Skins ring of honor. He is the heart of this team and to question that is ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Austin, Texas
Age: 55
Posts: 2,015
|
Re: Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?
Uhhhh they are 3-1, I say the 2 back system is working nicely.
__________________
"Work Harder: millions on welfare are counting on you" - Obama 2009 address to Congress. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Warrenton, Virginia
Age: 45
Posts: 1,515
|
Re: Portis and Betts: Should We Just Stick With Portis?
Great idea. Then we'll do to our running game what the Bears did to theirs in the offseason. Gut it. we have 40% of last year's starting offensive line. Our entire right side is staffed with backups.
And Clinton plays with a reckless abandon that 35 snaps a game will virtually guarantee he misses time through a season due to injury. You can keep him running healthier, and thus harder if you can keep his load between 20 and 25 carries. And, they are different types of backs. Defenses get used to how fast Clinton hits the hole, and then the change of pace with Ladell can affect the timing for the opposition's run attack. Come on. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|