Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


We've got big trouble on the OL.

Locker Room Main Forum


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-31-2012, 10:12 PM   #1
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,041
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RGIII View Post
What type of camp is Massie having right now? He's probably getting run over the "Rob Jacksons" of the league...
this made me laugh...Poor ole Willie, Rob Jackson is just playin to rough for him. Go over and sit between Kory L and effing Jamal Brown on the bench.


Dear Baby Jesus, please turn Tom "City of" Compton into a average RT.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline  
Old 07-31-2012, 09:18 PM   #2
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,849
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
I've never really understood the "I don't know if there were any good linemen at that point in the draft, but we should have taken one anyway" argument
Drafting for need over BPA is never a good plan.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline  
Old 07-31-2012, 10:37 PM   #3
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Drafting for need over BPA is never a good plan.
I say it depends. If you have two players that are one or two points apart on your board and one fits a need then generally speaking the one that fits the need is obviously the better fit.

I feel like the part where teams get in trouble comes when they reach past 5 or 10 available players for a guy that happens to fit a need.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline  
Old 07-31-2012, 09:47 PM   #4
artmonkforhallofamein07
Pro Bowl
 
artmonkforhallofamein07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Full disclosure, I dont feel great about the line and I was hoping that they would address the t and guard spots in FA.

I got on the cousins thing because others brought it up and I don't see why that is really that important now. Because as I see it I don't see any fourth round tackles that would have been anything more this year then depth. Say for example next draft we bring in a day one starting t with our second round pick. In that scenario we still have cousins and a t ready to play next year. Which is most likely where you may want to start playing a fourth round guy.
__________________
Just win.
artmonkforhallofamein07 is offline  
Old 07-31-2012, 09:55 PM   #5
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by artmonkforhallofamein07 View Post
Because as I see it I don't see any fourth round tackles that would have been anything more this year then depth. Say for example next draft we bring in a day one starting t with our second round pick. In that scenario we still have cousins and a t ready to play next year. Which is most likely where you may want to start playing a fourth round guy.
But why limit address the RT position only to the 4th round pick?
Why not the 3rd pick? There have been 3rd round RT that came on, start and play well. (Ryan Harris IIRC)

Also, based on Willie Smith and Maurice Hurt level of play both of which were arguable/visibly better then Jammaml Brown. (Which is also backed up by profootball focus advanced metrics)
Then I would argue if an UDFA rookie and a 6-7th round pick graded out better then Jammal Brown chances are pretty good that a 3rd/4th round RT would have been better then JB. (not to mention without a chronic hip condition)
30gut is offline  
Old 07-31-2012, 10:04 PM   #6
artmonkforhallofamein07
Pro Bowl
 
artmonkforhallofamein07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

30. I am not limiting the round of the pick and nor am I saying that we couldn't have used a tackle in the third or fourth round. There is a method to the skins FO madness and to this point they have done a decent job of turning over the team to get more productive guys.

Like I said above I would have liked to have seen a different approach in FA where there was opportunity to upgrade the position with the money that was spent on Morgan in particular.

I am sure that the RT spot is something where the Skins are looking for a long term solution but during this offseason and draft they didn't find the "right" player to put their resources into.
__________________
Just win.
artmonkforhallofamein07 is offline  
Old 07-31-2012, 10:16 PM   #7
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by artmonkforhallofamein07 View Post
There is a method to the skins FO madness and to this point they have done a decent job of turning over the team to get more productive guys.
There maybe a method.
And I agree that by and large the FO is doing a good job.
It bugs the heck out of me that being critical of a specific decision somehow implies disagreement with the process as a whole.

Quote:
...but during this offseason and draft they didn't find the "right" player to put their resources into.
It can be framed in whichever light you like, but the end result was Jammal Brown.

Its just that with a rookie QB, heading into a fairly important season (record-wise) it would be nice to have a more solid solution at RT.
Imo murphy laws applies to football and wherever a team has a weakness or lack of depth that is gonna become the critical area/weakest link.
A weak link on the OL can serious hinder an offense, especially an offense trying to bring along a rookie QB.

I'm hopeful that Tyler will step up, I'm actually assuming that Tyler had to factor into the FO comfort level at the RT position.

Last edited by 30gut; 07-31-2012 at 10:21 PM.
30gut is offline  
Old 07-31-2012, 10:04 PM   #8
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

When did the RT position become so important in lieu of everything else?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline  
Old 07-31-2012, 10:05 PM   #9
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
When did the RT position become so important in lieu of everything else?
I don't know when did?
30gut is offline  
Old 07-31-2012, 11:15 PM   #10
Chief X_Phackter
Pro Bowl
 
Chief X_Phackter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,644
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
When did the RT position become so important in lieu of everything else?
When the opportunity arose to pick apart the decisions of the front office again based on a little injury news.

Fact of the matter is I'd rather this happen now than after week 1. At least KL is expected back for the regular season.
Chief X_Phackter is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 12:03 AM   #11
artmonkforhallofamein07
Pro Bowl
 
artmonkforhallofamein07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief X_Phackter View Post
When the opportunity arose to pick apart the decisions of the front office again based on a little injury news.

Fact of the matter is I'd rather this happen now than after week 1. At least KL is expected back for the regular season.
And it does present an opportunity for the young guys to get a lot of reps with the first and second groups. Better to fail now then when it counts.
__________________
Just win.
artmonkforhallofamein07 is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 07:24 AM   #12
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,041
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
When did the RT position become so important in lieu of everything else?
Since chico's Oline Offseason Edition thread where many agreed Oline and RT in particular were issues. I think QB, WR, S, RT, CB were all positions where improvement was needed. The Cap penalty was certainly an issue, but there were certainly veteran players who were available and affordable. Ill still point to both the 3rd and 4th round where there was solid RT talent. Options were available and we got fooled again.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 07:29 AM   #13
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
Since chico's Oline Offseason Edition thread where many agreed Oline and RT in particular were issues. I think QB, WR, S, RT, CB were all positions where improvement was needed. The Cap penalty was certainly an issue, but there were certainly veteran players who were available and affordable. Ill still point to both the 3rd and 4th round where there was solid RT talent. Options were available and we got fooled again.
And we made an effort to get those guys. If we hadn't drafted LeRibeus in the 3rd people would be complaining we have no depth behind Lichtensteiger
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 08:57 AM   #14
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,041
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
And we made an effort to get those guys. If we hadn't drafted LeRibeus in the 3rd people would be complaining we have no depth behind Lichtensteiger
Is McRib gonna play guard? Heard that hasnt been going so well, looking more like a Center. SS, when does anyone complain around here?

Well at least Laron isnt fooling us again this year, only JB. Roger Daultrey should be our lead vocalist for the Skins.

Any word on Willie's injury?
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 09:05 AM   #15
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
Is McRib gonna play guard? Heard that hasnt been going so well, looking more like a Center. SS, when does anyone complain around here?

Well at least Laron isnt fooling us again this year, only JB. Roger Daultrey should be our lead vocalist for the Skins.

Any word on Willie's injury?
He's a rookie, for one thing. So struggles are expected. And he's learning both G and C

How exactly are you defining "complain"?

Willie is fine health wise
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.69884 seconds with 10 queries