![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#76 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
|
Re: Our WRs in 2009... My Thoughts
Quote:
I don't expect anyone to have the same "character" standards as Joe Gibbs, but in this case I really hope DT isn't as much of a problem as JLC says he is. I know JLC gets bashed here for some of his opinions (and sometimes errors), but over time I don't think he puts anything in print about a player's work ethic & character until he's got a good body of evidence. Take a look at his writing about Loyd e.g. |
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
#77 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Our WRs in 2009... My Thoughts
Quote:
If this front office traded for a healthy Tom Brady JLC would criticize them for him being a character risk for having a baby out of wedlock.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#78 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: Our WRs in 2009... My Thoughts
Quote:
The Broncos system has been in place forever. Its not new. Although they have a new WR coach the all the other coaching staff knows the system, the HC, the OC, assistants etc. They also have veterans that can help the rookies learn the playbook. The Skins offense is new. Its new to the OC, its new to the WR coach, its new to the rest of the staff and the assistants. Its also new to our veterans. Moss and ARE can't help the rookies as much as Stoley could help Royal b/c they were learning the playbook themselves. Our young guys will catch, remember its a new system. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#79 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Our WRs in 2009... My Thoughts
Quote:
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#80 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Our WRs in 2009... My Thoughts
Quote:
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#81 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
|
Re: Our WRs in 2009... My Thoughts
Quote:
I'm not trying to bash Vinny's choices. Well, maybe I am w/Kelly's knees if it's true that the med. staff red flagged it. I thought Thomas was a relative steal where we got him & was certainly worth taking a chance on. I do think it's obvious that the jury is still out on these guys. We didn't see enough in 08 to show us that they'll become playmakers. I trust JLC's reporting about Thomas' behavior, as I don't think he would write it if he didn't have good info after a full season. Sounds like the guy has a lot of personal maturing to do, hope that he can do that here in DC & be at least a dependable starter for us. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,851
|
Re: Our WRs in 2009... My Thoughts
So Devin Thomas needs to get away from football for a while huh. Wow, not good to hear at all. I understand that all players need a break after the season, but this guy better grow up quick. We need him to be working his ass off this offseason. Anyone remember the little comments that JC and Cooley made at times last year about guys not working hard? I'm convinced they were talking about Thomas now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#83 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Our WRs in 2009... My Thoughts
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,851
|
Re: Our WRs in 2009... My Thoughts
JC made some comments pretty recently though long after Mix was outta here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Our WRs in 2009... My Thoughts
I would suggest, dare I say, bring back Maurice Mann, Mix (yes I said Mix), McMullen, and go grab Marcus Monk (since he was cut by the Giants) and ...hire a more knowledgable WR's coach and work these guys as well as Thomas and Kelly's butts off and let them know Moss and ARE are on the team the rest of the positions are available for them if they can prove themselves. Then I would invite any undrafted WR's to come and show case their talent. If we are keeping 6-7 WR's on the team then work them to death over the off season and hopefully they work out.
Mix ...I would advise to lose weight and work his ass off. Maybe it's just the working part he doesn't like but working out might lose the weight for him. |
|
|
|
|
|
#86 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,783
|
Re: Our WRs in 2009... My Thoughts
Quote:
It just seems that WR stats fluctuate wildly based on circumstance. Look when Welker goes to NE, Moss goes to Oakland, Roddy White gets a new QB, Santana is all over the map, etc.) I just find it hard to believe that we whiffed completely on Kelly, Thomas and Davis. With our offense being one of the worst in the league, I don't see how we could have done any worse with those guys on the field. And like I've said many times, there are ways to move the ball and score points without relying heavily on receivers (San Diego, Miami, Baltimore, KC, for many years, etc.). I'm more inclined to point to other factors, such as poor coaching and development, poor pass protection and/or poor QB play (hard to tell for sure what's to blame), and poor play calling. And it's not just with rookies. We take guys like Brandon Lloyd and David Patten and get little to no production out of them (New Orleans and Chicago got at least marginal production from both of them). There are systemic problems with the Skins than supercede any deficiencies with the players. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,783
|
Re: Our WRs in 2009... My Thoughts
Was Antonio Bryant available last year? He was a beast for Tampa Bay and they only had to pay the veteran minimum to get him. A guy like him is all the Skins needed last year. I know he's had his issues, but if they got him they could have used their picks to beef up the lines.
Just a thought. |
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Our WRs in 2009... My Thoughts
Oh, missed those. Thought you were talking about their comments during training camp
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#89 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Our WRs in 2009... My Thoughts
Quote:
And the answer on Thomas was a very obvious no. One great season followed up by a return to reality a second round receiver does not make. The assumption that a year he started as Michigan State's second target, and caught a bunch of people by surprise en route to a 100+ reception season (literally out of no where), and this was a reflection of his actual value was nothing but wishful thinking and poor evaluation by the draft analysts, who tried to use the combine numbers to justify the poor reasoning. Malcolm Kelly, on the other hand, is probably still a top two round selection in 2009 simply by virtue of staying healthy for 12 games in 2008. So, health aside, Kelly passes the hypothetical above. And obviously, as a Senior, Fred Davis doesn't apply because he played out his eligibility, and gave us a pretty good idea who he was coming out of the draft. I'm not sure that he screamed first round prospect, but Davis has in no way underachieved in his first season, IMO.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#90 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Our WRs in 2009... My Thoughts
Quote:
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|