I say we "Dive for a Top 5"!!!!!

[kevinjames1973]

I love that we have some really tough teams coming up. The young guys will get to play and learn against some of the best in the nfl. We will most likely lose most of them so have a good shot at a top 5 pick. And maybe a team like the Rams will get #1 and if we are top 5 it wont cost us our next 3 drafts to move up to get Luck. I will take losses for valuable experience for rookies like Hankerson,Helu and Paul. I just want to see improvement from week to week. And will also get us that guy at Qb where its so obvious we are lacking.

[over the mountain]

without a run game, i dont see us being remotely competitive anyways so i dont think we will have to try at losing.

just a few games ago everyone was talking about no less than a 10-6 season . . . .

[kevinjames1973]

Just a fun fact. Andrew Lucks number is 12. Maybe we can squint our eyes real tight and pretend its net year and we have Andrew Luck not John Beck

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by kevinjames1973

Just a fun fact. Andrew Lucks number is 12. Maybe we can squint our eyes real tight and pretend its net year and we have Andrew Luck not John Beck

Yeah, Luck is like the Ferrari and Beck is like the ghetto Yugo.

[kevinjames1973]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

Yeah, Luck is like the Ferrari and Beck is like the ghetto Yugo.

I didnt say you wouldnt have to squint really really really hard.

[WilbursHomie]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

LOL. This thread gets to stay open just so people can enjoy your post.

I appreciate it. It may be the smartest thing I've ever said.

[rbanerjee23]

How has this thread not been shut down?

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by rbanerjee23

How has this thread not been shut down?

Because we're Whiffin for Griffin.

[mooby]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

Because we're Whiffin for Griffin.

Why should we start whiffin for Griffin, when we can smell the allure of Moore.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by mooby

Why should we start whiffin for Griffin, when we can smell the allure of Moore.

Jonesing for Landry? No?

[mooby]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

Jonesing for Landry? No?

Lolllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll I actually thought about that before I came up with the allure of Moore, and I was like nahhh. Kudos to you though for putting it out there.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by GMScud

I think starting 3 rookies on offense, all of whom were picked in the 3rd round or later, is the beginning of the "rebuilding" mindset of this team manifested on the field, at least as far as offense goes anyway. No coach will ever use the words "rebuilding" mid-season, but at this point it's clear we need to find out what we have in certain areas.

What will be interesting is how The Shanny Brain Trust handles the QB sitch. IMO Beck looks way in over his head. Badly really. But at this point switching back to Rex is a flat out admission by the staff that we don't have a QB. Even though everyone already knows that, the coaching staff has "staked their reputation" on these guys. It will be interesting to see if, or when, they actually admit we're nowhere at the most important position in the game.

All that said, the notion that teams intentionally tank is dumb.

At this point, why not admit it? Why not say we don't have a QB, but we think we have some receivers and running backs and they would benefit more right now from Rex throwing them the ball than Beck. Or heck, just start Crompton already

[WilbursHomie]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

Jonesing for Landry? No?

Solid

[kevinjames1973]

Feenin for Weeden

[CultBrennan59]

We should. I would really monitor the Rams for the rest of the year skins fans.

If they have the first overall pick our chances of getting luck just got somewhere.