Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Who do you expect to see starting at right guard on Sunday?
Rinehart 95 76.61%
Montgomery 17 13.71%
Armstrong 12 9.68%
Voters: 124. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-22-2009, 01:56 PM   #1
Skinny Tee
The Starter
 
Skinny Tee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Redskins Nation
Posts: 1,715
Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)

I'm hearing that Armstrong is going to start.

I'd say that makes sense being that C. Reinhardt wasn't even dressed this past SUN. If Chad is considered the backup wouldn't he at least dressed for the Rams game.
__________________
Redskinsly,
_________Skinny Tee_________
Skinny Tee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2009, 02:01 PM   #2
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,850
Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)

Who the F is Armstrong??

I feel like a broken record but there's a perfectly logical reason as to why Rinehart has been inactive. He only plays guard where as someone like Montgomery can fill in at guard and center.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2009, 02:03 PM   #3
PennSkinsFan
Impact Rookie
 
PennSkinsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Age: 55
Posts: 752
Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
Who the F is Armstrong??

I feel like a broken record but there's a perfectly logical reason as to why Rinehart has been inactive. He only plays guard where as someone like Montgomery can fill in at guard and center.
Lmao. Never heard of Armstrong. I she talking about Montgomery? And if he is, that's not even close.
__________________
DC Pro Sports Report - Home of the Internet's Largest NFL Mock Draft Database. Best Redskins Redskins discussion, theWarpath.net

PennSkinsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2009, 02:03 PM   #4
T.O.Killa
The Starter
 
T.O.Killa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 2,061
Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)

Wow the Redskins insiders are always so hard on the front office. I think his assesment of the Oline is a little to harsh. They have not been that bad. They gave up two sacks to the most fierce pass rush in the NFL. Heyer has been decent, and I expect him to continue to get better. Anyway here is the story.
Redskins Insider - Play-Calling Isn't the Only Problem
T.O.Killa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2009, 02:17 PM   #5
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)

Quote:
Originally Posted by T.O.Killa View Post
Wow the Redskins insiders are always so hard on the front office. I think his assesment of the Oline is a little to harsh. They have not been that bad. They gave up two sacks to the most fierce pass rush in the NFL. Heyer has been decent, and I expect him to continue to get better. Anyway here is the story.
Redskins Insider - Play-Calling Isn't the Only Problem

" In their internal offseason evaluation of the roster, the Redskins identified the offensive line as their main deficiency."


And then, Dockery aside, we did nothing to address said main deficiency. Still baffles me. And please, no one give me Mike Williams as addressing the line. He's the offensive equivalent of Erasmus James.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 02:42 PM   #6
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud View Post

" In their internal offseason evaluation of the roster, the Redskins identified the offensive line as their main deficiency."


And then, Dockery aside, we did nothing to address said main deficiency. Still baffles me. And please, no one give me Mike Williams as addressing the line. He's the offensive equivalent of Erasmus James.
This is the bottom line IMHO...the oline is marginally better than last year's and that's prior to the Thomas injury. This Sunday will be the real test.

...W. Montgomery was ok in run-blocking but struggled in the pass protection. My gut is it will be the same w/ Rinehart, and Heyer was being "held-up" by Randy. On the one had I won't be surprised if the right side is a disaster moving forward, on the other hand Fabini has been jobless w/ the trucking business in the toilet so he can always come back to fight his guts out
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2009, 02:31 PM   #7
Slingin Sammy 33
Playmaker
 
Slingin Sammy 33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)

Quote:
Originally Posted by T.O.Killa View Post
Wow the Redskins insiders are always so hard on the front office. I think his assesment of the Oline is a little to harsh. They have not been that bad. They gave up two sacks to the most fierce pass rush in the NFL. Heyer has been decent, and I expect him to continue to get better. Anyway here is the story.
Redskins Insider - Play-Calling Isn't the Only Problem
Another issue I have is with the comparisons from Gibbs 1 to the current times. We have these things called a salary cap and FA now that we didn't need to worry about the first go-round. If those weren't there we'd be contenders every year like the Red Sox & Yankees. Everyone would want to come here because like the Squire, Snyder would spend whatever it took to win.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996.
Slingin Sammy 33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2009, 03:05 PM   #8
T.O.Killa
The Starter
 
T.O.Killa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 2,061
Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slingin Sammy 33 View Post
Another issue I have is with the comparisons from Gibbs 1 to the current times. We have these things called a salary cap and FA now that we didn't need to worry about the first go-round. If those weren't there we'd be contenders every year like the Red Sox & Yankees. Everyone would want to come here because like the Squire, Snyder would spend whatever it took to win.
People seem to forget that. We were the highest payed team in the league. Most people did not know that. Another thing people forget is that we had a very good GM, Bobby Bethard, that Joe Gibbs ran out of town, in 1990. It was said that they had fierce arguments over young versus old players. Joe Gibbs wanting to go with veterans and Bethard want to go with youth. I remember feeling betrayed by Gibbs for costing us Bethard and then abruptly retiring, like a year or two later. Bethard went on to take the Chargers to a superbowl, while the Redskins went on to be one of the worst teams in the NFL.
T.O.Killa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2009, 05:53 PM   #9
Beemnseven
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)

Quote:
Originally Posted by T.O.Killa View Post
Wow the Redskins insiders are always so hard on the front office. I think his assesment of the Oline is a little to harsh. They have not been that bad. They gave up two sacks to the most fierce pass rush in the NFL. Heyer has been decent, and I expect him to continue to get better. Anyway here is the story.
Redskins Insider - Play-Calling Isn't the Only Problem
Zero yards rushing in the first half against the Detroit Lions.

No draft picks devoted to the offensive line in the 1st or 2nd rounds of the draft since 2000.

We are seeing the results.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2009, 05:54 PM   #10
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemnseven View Post
Zero yards rushing in the first half against the Detroit Lions.

No draft picks devoted to the offensive line in the 1st or 2nd rounds of the draft since 2000.

We are seeing the results.
Yup, Clinton Portis has NOTHING to do with this folks. It's all the offensive line.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2009, 06:02 PM   #11
Beemnseven
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
Yup, Clinton Portis has NOTHING to do with this folks. It's all the offensive line.
Come on. You think the O-line is just fine?

YEAH -- We've got nothing but Pro Bowlers and future Hall of Famers up front don't we?
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2009, 06:04 PM   #12
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemnseven View Post
Come on. You think the O-line is just fine?

YEAH -- We've got nothing but Pro Bowlers and future Hall of Famers up front don't we?
I don't think the o-line is fine, but I just don't see him being a factor at all. The only guy we're paying a lot of money on the o-line is Samuels, meanwhile we're paying CP a ton of money.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 05:10 PM   #13
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)

Well Zorn seems to be saying good things about Rinehart. I don't think the fact he hasn't been named the starter is an obvious sign Zorn has no confidence in Rinehart.

Quote:
Chad Rinehart, the third-round pick in 2008 who has yet to suit up, could be named the starter.

“We have liked him in there with the starting group because they have helped him rise up,” Zorn said.
Zorn Looks to Make Right Decision At Right Guard

Quote:
Asked how Rinehart looked, Zorn replied: “Chad was strong. I saw him battling. I saw Will battling in there, too.”
Rinehart, Montgomery Split Reps At Right Guard
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 05:40 PM   #14
mlmpetert
Playmaker
 
mlmpetert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,261
Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Well Zorn seems to be saying good things about Rinehart. I don't think the fact he hasn't been named the starter is an obvious sign Zorn has no confidence in Rinehart.



Zorn Looks to Make Right Decision At Right Guard



Rinehart, Montgomery Split Reps At Right Guard
Yeah me saying Zorn has NO confidence is a a little strong, i take that back.

Gald to see hes saying good things i just wish things were settle on the oline and the player likely in for the rest of the seasons (and beyond) was taking all the snaps right now.
__________________
mlmpetert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 06:01 PM   #15
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,850
Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)

#1 we don't have an OL named Armstrong

#2 It's spelled R-I-N-E-H-A-R-T for crying out loud.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.50962 seconds with 11 queries