![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: Who do you expect to see starting at right guard on Sunday? | |||
| Rinehart |
|
95 | 76.61% |
| Montgomery |
|
17 | 13.71% |
| Armstrong |
|
12 | 9.68% |
| Voters: 124. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Redskins Nation
Posts: 1,715
|
Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)
I'm hearing that Armstrong is going to start.
I'd say that makes sense being that C. Reinhardt wasn't even dressed this past SUN. If Chad is considered the backup wouldn't he at least dressed for the Rams game.
__________________
Redskinsly, _________Skinny Tee_________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,850
|
Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)
Who the F is Armstrong??
I feel like a broken record but there's a perfectly logical reason as to why Rinehart has been inactive. He only plays guard where as someone like Montgomery can fill in at guard and center. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2005
Age: 55
Posts: 752
|
Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)
Lmao. Never heard of Armstrong. I she talking about Montgomery? And if he is, that's not even close.
__________________
DC Pro Sports Report - Home of the Internet's Largest NFL Mock Draft Database. Best Redskins Redskins discussion, theWarpath.net |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 2,061
|
Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)
Wow the Redskins insiders are always so hard on the front office. I think his assesment of the Oline is a little to harsh. They have not been that bad. They gave up two sacks to the most fierce pass rush in the NFL. Heyer has been decent, and I expect him to continue to get better. Anyway here is the story.
Redskins Insider - Play-Calling Isn't the Only Problem |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)
Quote:
" In their internal offseason evaluation of the roster, the Redskins identified the offensive line as their main deficiency." And then, Dockery aside, we did nothing to address said main deficiency. Still baffles me. And please, no one give me Mike Williams as addressing the line. He's the offensive equivalent of Erasmus James.
__________________
Tardy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)
Quote:
...W. Montgomery was ok in run-blocking but struggled in the pass protection. My gut is it will be the same w/ Rinehart, and Heyer was being "held-up" by Randy. On the one had I won't be surprised if the right side is a disaster moving forward, on the other hand Fabini has been jobless w/ the trucking business in the toilet so he can always come back to fight his guts out
__________________
24-34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
|
Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)
Quote:
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 2,061
|
Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)
Quote:
No draft picks devoted to the offensive line in the 1st or 2nd rounds of the draft since 2000. We are seeing the results. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
|
Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)
Yup, Clinton Portis has NOTHING to do with this folks. It's all the offensive line.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
|
Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)
I don't think the o-line is fine, but I just don't see him being a factor at all. The only guy we're paying a lot of money on the o-line is Samuels, meanwhile we're paying CP a ton of money.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | ||
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)
Well Zorn seems to be saying good things about Rinehart. I don't think the fact he hasn't been named the starter is an obvious sign Zorn has no confidence in Rinehart.
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,261
|
Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)
Quote:
Gald to see hes saying good things i just wish things were settle on the oline and the player likely in for the rest of the seasons (and beyond) was taking all the snaps right now.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,850
|
Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)
#1 we don't have an OL named Armstrong
#2 It's spelled R-I-N-E-H-A-R-T for crying out loud. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|