Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


My evaluation of Shanahan starts now

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-03-2012, 10:20 PM   #1
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,577
Re: My evaluation of Shanahan starts now

Quote:
Originally Posted by 44 goes 50 gut View Post
No kidding, the first year Campbell was benched repeatedly for Gradkowski and only started due to injury, the second year he lucked into a couple wins while throwing for 150 yards and the usual one TD, while his running game did all the heavy lifting until he got injured NOT SLIDING (as usual) and was replaced by a mediocre Carson Palmer.
Very convincing post, I can tell you aren't bitter at all about Campbell and have no prejudices against him whatsoever that could potentially make me dismiss your opinion on the subject.
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2012, 11:10 PM   #2
44 goes 50 gut
Registered User
 
44 goes 50 gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 79
Re: My evaluation of Shanahan starts now

Quote:
Originally Posted by mooby View Post
Very convincing post, I can tell you aren't bitter at all about Campbell and have no prejudices against him whatsoever that could potentially make me dismiss your opinion on the subject.
Wow defensive much? I'm not bitter at all it doesn't bother me that Campbell is clearly a backup and not a starter in the NFL. It apparently bothers you enough to get all huffy over an unkind description of a backup QB who is two years removed from the Skins... So who's the bitter one?

Dissmiss me all you want ultimately he didn't impress anyone (who matters) enough to get EVEN A SHOT at a starting job, in a league where Kevin Kolb versus John Skelton is a thing. If that's not telling enough; he went to Chicago where he's the backup to the QB who some fans thought wasn't worth trading Campbell for. Hows that for irony... Bitter irony for some I suspect?
44 goes 50 gut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2012, 06:04 AM   #3
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
Re: My evaluation of Shanahan starts now

Quote:
Originally Posted by 44 goes 50 gut View Post
Wow defensive much? I'm not bitter at all it doesn't bother me that Campbell is clearly a backup and not a starter in the NFL. It apparently bothers you enough to get all huffy over an unkind description of a backup QB who is two years removed from the Skins... So who's the bitter one?

Dissmiss me all you want ultimately he didn't impress anyone (who matters) enough to get EVEN A SHOT at a starting job, in a league where Kevin Kolb versus John Skelton is a thing. If that's not telling enough; he went to Chicago where he's the backup to the QB who some fans thought wasn't worth trading Campbell for. Hows that for irony... Bitter irony for some I suspect?
Lol, you mad huh?
Your perception of the events around Jason Campbell are skewed beyond belief.

-HTTR

Last edited by 30gut; 09-04-2012 at 08:42 AM.
30gut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2012, 01:06 PM   #4
44 goes 50 gut
Registered User
 
44 goes 50 gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 79
Re: My evaluation of Shanahan starts now

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
Lol, you mad huh?
Your perception of the events around Jason Campbell are skewed beyond belief.

-HTTR
Last I'll say on the matter because no one else wants to read an off topic derail about Campbell: I know its hard for Campbell fans to admit they were wrong but He's a backup in a league where Kolb and Skelton are competing for a starting spot.

If that doesn't clue you I don't know what else to say...
44 goes 50 gut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2012, 02:08 PM   #5
mredskins
Gamebreaker
 
mredskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,015
Re: My evaluation of Shanahan starts now

Quote:
Originally Posted by 44 goes 50 gut View Post
Last I'll say on the matter because no one else wants to read an off topic derail about Campbell: I know its hard for Campbell fans to admit they were wrong but He's a backup in a league where Kolb and Skelton are competing for a starting spot.

If that doesn't clue you I don't know what else to say...
That is really not a fair statement CHI has a better QB situation then AZ. I am fairly positive JC would start over Kolb and/or Skelton if he played on AZ.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs!
mredskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2012, 11:12 AM   #6
44 goes 50 gut
Registered User
 
44 goes 50 gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 79
Re: My evaluation of Shanahan starts now

Quote:
Originally Posted by mredskins View Post
That is really not a fair statement CHI has a better QB situation then AZ. I am fairly positive JC would start over Kolb and/or Skelton if he played on AZ.
That's exactly my point, if he was good enough to start then someone... like AZ would have signed him this off season, or they would trade for him now once realizing their mistake.

Prima facia: the league considers him a backup QB.
44 goes 50 gut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2012, 04:33 PM   #7
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
Re: My evaluation of Shanahan starts now

Quote:
Originally Posted by 44 goes 50 gut View Post
Last I'll say on the matter because no one else wants to read an off topic derail about Campbell.
Then don't belly aching over him, lol
30gut is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.00451 seconds with 11 queries