The Redskins want to replace Jon Jansen for good

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by The Goat

JLC said some retarded stuff here IMO. We need to add 2 or 3 LBs? Really? What the hell are we doing switching to a 3-4 defense before the season starts. We need one playmaker at OLB to ensure 1) Taylor play's at his pro-bowl position RDE 2) if there is an injury to one of the starters we have a guy to come in and play like a starter i.e. Blades. JLC is just making stuff up here...

Sounds like what I wrote in the other thread.

[SFREDSKIN]

If they really want get rid of Jansen, then they should cut him and eat his salary cap. Sign Runyan (as much as I hate him, he's a mauler) draft Mack this year and draft another T or 2 in 2010.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

If they really want get rid of Jansen, then they should cut him and eat his salary cap. Sign Runyan (as much as I hate him, he's a mauler) draft Mack this year and draft another T or 2 in 2010.

Why would you replace Jansen with Runyan?

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Why would you replace Jansen with Runyan?

So his stench can take out the d-linemen?

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Why would you replace Jansen with Runyan?

I rather have Jansen and give him another chance. The only reason I say this is, if Jansen does get cut then I would sign Runyan and give him a 1 year contract and plug the whole for this year.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

I rather have Jansen and give him another chance. The only reason I say this is, if Jansen does get cut then I would sign Runyan and give him a 1 year contract and plug the whole for this year.

Do you think Runyan would come cheap? I doubt it. Plus half of this board would blow up for bringing another aging lineman into the mix.

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

I rather have Jansen and give him another chance. The only reason I say this is, if Jansen does get cut then I would sign Runyan and give him a 1 year contract and plug the whole for this year.

jansen can't get cut. it's cheaper to keep him, so he's here regardless.

[WaldSkins]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Why would you replace Jansen with Runyan?

Jansen doesn't have a commercial with ford.

[GusFrerotte]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

If they really want get rid of Jansen, then they should cut him and eat his salary cap. Sign Runyan (as much as I hate him, he's a mauler) draft Mack this year and draft another T or 2 in 2010.

Like your ideas, but not sure about eating salary cap $$$ with the recent signings.


PS. Can any of you guys tell me about the neighborhoods near Bolling AFB? I am looking at making the big move to DC from Detroit and looking at potential apartments.

[Pocket$ $traight]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

If they really want get rid of Jansen, then they should cut him and eat his salary cap. Sign Runyan (as much as I hate him, he's a mauler) draft Mack this year and draft another T or 2 in 2010.

Since none of these things is going to happen I won't spend too much time with it.

If they draft a lineman at 13 it HAS to be a tackle. They don't need a center right now, they need a tackle. Next year is a different story.

If they signed Runyan, Vinny should be fired immediately. Jansen is hopefully going to be the backup and then he is gone next year. They aren't cutting anyone who would count against the cap this year. (One of the reasons that trading Rogers for a pick(s) made zero sense)

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by Pocket$ $traight

If they signed Runyan, Vinny should be fired immediately. Jansen is hopefully going to be the backup and then he is gone next year. They aren't cutting anyone who would count against the cap this year. (One of the reasons that trading Rogers for a pick(s) made zero sense)

I posted this cause a lot of people in this forum want Jansen gone. Personally I want him to be given one more chance, as for signing Runyan, it would have to be a 1 year contract just to fill the hole if they decide to cut Jansen. Runyan is in his mid 30's and can still play and I just don't see people lining up to signing him unless it's for the vet minimum in which you don't break the bank if you draft someone with the 13th pick. We just spent 180mil on 3 players and our cap space is close, especially after the draft. My theory is you trade down get Mack instead of some questionable T and fill the position the next year.

[Pocket$ $traight]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

I posted this cause a lot of people in this forum want Jansen gone. Personally I want him to be given one more chance, as for signing Runyan, it would have to be a 1 year contract just to fill the hole if they decide to cut Jansen. Runyan is in his mid 30's and can still play and I just don't see people lining up to signing him unless it's for the vet minimum in which you don't break the bank if you draft someone with the 13th pick. We just spent 180mil on 3 players and our cap space is close, especially after the draft. My theory is you trade down get Mack instead of some questionable T and fill the position the next year.

Why would Runyan sign a one year deal? It doesn't make sense for him or his agent. I don't see Runyan as much of an upgrade from Jansen.

There is a reason that we have the 13th pick, only 12 teams were worse than us. We don't need a backup center with our first round pick we need a starting tackle.

I don't know which of the four top tackles are questionable. That Outland Trophy that Andre Smith earned answers all of my questions.

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by Pocket$ $traight

Why would Runyan sign a one year deal? It doesn't make sense for him or his agent. I don't see Runyan as much of an upgrade from Jansen.

There is a reason that we have the 13th pick, only 12 teams were worse than us. We don't need a backup center with our first round pick we need a starting tackle.

I don't know which of the four top tackles are questionable. That Outland Trophy that Andre Smith earned answers all of my questions.

Mack can play C or G, Thomas is a ?. Rinehart can play T so can Heyer, no one is going to sign Runyan for more than 2 years. People complain about Jansen being injured all the time, Runyan is always on the field and knows the NFC East opponents well. Smith right now is a ? unless he changes his way till draft day.

[Pocket$ $traight]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

Mack can play C or G, Thomas is a ?. Rinehart can play T so can Heyer, no one is going to sign Runyan for more than 2 years. People complain about Jansen being injured all the time, Runyan is always on the field and knows the NFC East opponents well. Smith right now is a ? unless he changes his way till draft day.

So we should bench Randy Thomas for a rookie and bring in John Runyan who is a frickin eagle and is a liability in pass pro just like Jansen. That would mean 3 of the 5 starters on the line are gone and two of the new starters know nothing about our system. Musical chairs on the line is usually a bad idea. Mack won his awards (which don't add up to Rinehart) at center, why would we draft him and make him a guard?

Is the goal to go after David Carr's record for sacks or to try and win the division?

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

Sounds like what I wrote in the other thread.

I didn't see anything about the Giants D-line destroying us in this article.