|  | 
| 
 | |||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion | 
|  | 
|  | Thread Tools | Display Modes | 
|  02-27-2009, 10:13 AM | #16 | 
| Mr. Brightside Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Leesburg, VA Age: 39 
					Posts: 4,453
				 | 
				
				Re: Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now"
			 
			
			why so dissapointed on canty? 10 career sacks in 4 seasons, i realize he was a 3-4 defensive end, but i think it would have been a gamble to get him too. id rather use the money elsewhere if we have any left
		 
				__________________ "I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs | 
|   |   | 
| Advertisements | 
|  02-27-2009, 10:42 AM | #17 | 
| I like big (_|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Charlottesville, Virginia Age: 44 
					Posts: 19,264
				 | 
				
				Re: Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now"
			 
			
			I'm thinking now that if we sign another lineman, I think we move back in the draft and take Mack or Robinson.
		 
				__________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. | 
|   |   | 
|  02-27-2009, 11:23 AM | #18 | 
| The Starter Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: New Jersey 
					Posts: 1,674
				 | 
				
				Re: Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now"
			 
			
			Why does everyone love Canty so much?  He barely did anything in Dallas.  Carter is better than Canty.
		 
				__________________ | 
|   |   | 
|  02-27-2009, 11:32 AM | #19 | |
| A Dude Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Newtown Square, PA Age: 46 
					Posts: 12,458
				 | 
				
				Re: Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now"
			 Quote: 
 I like the move, I'm just surprised they were able to part with a player the coaches loved so much. Good job by the front office in making a business decision. 
				__________________ God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. | |
|   |   | 
|  02-27-2009, 11:36 AM | #20 | |
| Swearinger Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Washington, DC 
					Posts: 12,626
				 | 
				
				Re: Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now"
			 Quote: 
 
				__________________ Tardy | |
|   |   | 
|  02-27-2009, 11:37 AM | #21 | 
| \m/  Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 52 
					Posts: 99,846
				 | 
				
				Re: Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now"
			 
			
			Canty might not have the pretty sack numbers but that could easily change in a 4-3 where he wouldn't be as occupied with taking on blocks, and he's very stout against the run.
		 | 
|   |   | 
|  02-27-2009, 11:40 AM | #22 | 
| Franchise Player Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Virginia 
					Posts: 7,766
				 | 
				
				Re: Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now"
			 
			
			I guess I just figured we would be letting Springs go cause we signed Hall and Canty was a move that might be replacing Taylor or taking up Springs money.
		 | 
|   |   | 
|  02-27-2009, 11:47 AM | #23 | 
| Uncle Phil Join Date: Feb 2004 
					Posts: 45,256
				 | 
				
				Re: Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now"
			 
			
			There's a difference between a restructure and a pay cut. Redskins had wanted Springs to take a straight cut.
		 
				__________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You | 
|   |   | 
|  02-27-2009, 11:50 AM | #24 | 
| Swearinger Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Washington, DC 
					Posts: 12,626
				 | 
				
				Re: Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now"
			 
			
			I understand that. I guess I'm just kind of confused. We've restructured older, oft-injured players (Griffin most recently) in the past to help lessen our immediate salary cap issues. I guess I just don't understand why we never went that route with Springs. Is he not more valuable to the defense when healthy than Griffin?
		 
				__________________ Tardy | 
|   |   | 
|  02-27-2009, 12:27 PM | #25 | |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL Age: 54 
					Posts: 5,006
				 | 
				
				Re: Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now"
			 Quote: 
 
				__________________ Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman | |
|   |   | 
|  02-27-2009, 12:28 PM | #26 | |
| The Starter Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: New Jersey 
					Posts: 1,674
				 | 
				
				Re: Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now"
			 Quote: 
 But none of this even matters anymore because we're not getting him anyway. 
				__________________ | |
|   |   | 
|  02-27-2009, 12:30 PM | #27 | |
| Swearinger Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Washington, DC 
					Posts: 12,626
				 | 
				
				Re: Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now"
			 Quote: 
 
				__________________ Tardy | |
|   |   | 
|  02-27-2009, 02:25 PM | #28 | 
| Uncle Phil Join Date: Feb 2004 
					Posts: 45,256
				 | 
				
				Re: Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now"
			 
				__________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You | 
|   |   | 
|  02-27-2009, 02:38 PM | #29 | |
| Playmaker Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Colorado Age: 37 
					Posts: 3,597
				 | 
				
				Re: Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now"
			 Quote: | |
|   |   | 
|  02-27-2009, 02:40 PM | #30 | 
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Evanston, IL Age: 37 
					Posts: 15,994
				 | 
				
				Re: Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now"
			 
			
			I know the Giants value DL depth above all else, but where in the world would he play in that defense?  Three-technique?
		 
				__________________ according to a source with knowledge of the situation. | 
|   |   | 
|  | 
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| 
 |  |