Supreme Court vacancy

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by mooby

+1



There is nothing in any branch of government that isn't immune to partisan politics anymore.



Thanks Drumpf.

The liberals made the Supreme Court partisan long ago with Roe as a litmus test, the conservatives followed suit quickly. This is simply the result of 2 generations of legal abortion and the bitter moral divide that ensued.





Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

[mooby]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

The liberals made the Supreme Court partisan long ago with Roe as a litmus test, the conservatives followed suit quickly. This is simply the result of 2 generations of legal abortion and the bitter moral divide that ensued.





Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Ah so you agree, the SC is partisan as fuck? Seems like the only thing we disagree on is how long it's been partisan.

Cool - look forward to the day when we tilt the scales back our way since things like precedent are out the window.

https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreak...eb2x&context=3

This girl sums up how I feel about the bible pretty well.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by mooby

Ah so you agree, the SC is partisan as fuck? Seems like the only thing we disagree on is how long it's been partisan.



Cool - look forward to the day when we tilt the scales back our way since things like precedent are out the window.



https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreak...eb2x&context=3



This girl sums up how I feel about the bible pretty well.

Shouldn't we also remember that roe v wade broke at least 100 years of established law?

The question for me always comes down to who should be protected more by the power of the government, an adult woman who makes a choice with potential consequences (not talking rape or other non consensual acts) or a potential human life that has no ability of self defense.

But the issue in the media is always liberal good conservative bad.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

[mooby]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Shouldn't we also remember that roe v wade broke at least 100 years of established law?

The question for me always comes down to who should be protected more by the power of the government, an adult woman who makes a choice with potential consequences (not talking rape or other non consensual acts) or a potential human life that has no ability of self defense.

But the issue in the media is always liberal good conservative bad.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

What do you say to those on your team that aren't willing to make exclusions for rape or incest?

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by mooby

What do you say to those on your team that aren't willing to make exclusions for rape or incest?

Rather than deflect from my point, why do you think the governments power should not be used to protect the powerless, which includes the unborn and rape victims both)?

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

[mooby]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Rather than deflect from my point, why do you think the governments power should not be used to protect the powerless, which includes the unborn and rape victims both)?

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Wish you guys felt the same about needy kids as you do about unborn fetuses.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by mooby

Wish you guys felt the same about needy kids as you do about unborn fetuses.

Still deflecting, and I do feel the same about needy kids, they are included in powerless, but adults who abuse the system are a different story.

But still, why should the government's focus not be on protecting an unborn child, not the couple who make a choice to discard it.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk