Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Would Skins Have Taken Jones?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-08-2019, 04:11 PM   #1
httr198020
Special Teams
 
httr198020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 277
Re: Would Skins Have Taken Jones?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Giantone View Post
This is false , Gruden wanted him, it's why the owner took over the draft room. See how that works?
Where is the evidence that Gruden wanted Jones outside of some rumors? There is no evidence that Dan took over the draft room. You don't know that and neither does anyone else. And if Gruden wanted to draft that bum Daniel Jones then he has no business making decisions in this organization.
httr198020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2019, 08:22 PM   #2
calia
Playmaker
 
calia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Woodside, CA
Age: 57
Posts: 3,756
Re: Would Skins Have Taken Jones?

Quote:
Originally Posted by httr198020 View Post
Where is the evidence that Gruden wanted Jones outside of some rumors? There is no evidence that Dan took over the draft room. You don't know that and neither does anyone else. And if Gruden wanted to draft that bum Daniel Jones then he has no business making decisions in this organization.
This
__________________
"Coach, what do you think of your team's execution?"
"I'm all for it." -- Coach McKay
calia is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.90479 seconds with 11 queries