Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Half Way Mark, Are You Satisfied? Expectations Going Forward

Locker Room Main Forum


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-07-2016, 04:31 PM   #26
over the mountain
Playmaker
 
over the mountain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: close to the edge
Posts: 4,926
Re: Half Way Mark, Are You Satisfied? Expectations Going Forward

Im satisfied - that they didnt take a step back this year. We were hoping for 8-8 or sneaking into the wildcard and that seems on schedule.

Im satisfied - that our run D and running attack has been addressed by the coaching staff. I wasnt sure our coaching staff could correct these 2 issues. They are still 2 of the biggest issues but, until we improve personnel, at least we somewhat addressed the issue from being bottom 3 to bottom 10.

Im satisfied - that next year, I will have big expectations.

So far this season has been a mixed bag, but more good than bad.
-------------------

Im not satisfied with the penalties. They have been a consistent killer. We are top 5 for most penalties so far. This has to be addressed and improve going forward.

NFL Penalties - 2016 League Penalty Stats - View by Total - NFL Penalty Stats Tracker - List/Statistics/Data of NFL Penalties - 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016
__________________
Life is brutal, but beautiful
over the mountain is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.61156 seconds with 11 queries