Smoot Lays the Smack Down (Redskins vs. Raiders)

mooby · 12-13-2009, 07:50 PM

Well you don't put Santana back there full time because he's your #1 wideout, and you don't put Hall back there full time because he's one of your starting corners, and we don't have a lot of depth guys that would make a dependable full time punt returner. It's ARE only because in the scheme of things if he went down we'd still have young depth at wideout to rely on. I doubt he'll be back there next season.

12-13-2009, 07:50 PM	#8
mooby Hug Anne Spyder Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 20,577	Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down (Redskins vs. Raiders) Well you don't put Santana back there full time because he's your #1 wideout, and you don't put Hall back there full time because he's one of your starting corners, and we don't have a lot of depth guys that would make a dependable full time punt returner. It's ARE only because in the scheme of things if he went down we'd still have young depth at wideout to rely on. I doubt he'll be back there next season. __________________ Hail to the Football Team

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Smoot Lays the Smack Down (Redskins vs. Raiders)

Locker Room Main Forum