Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Post game Packers

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-24-2018, 12:08 PM   #106
sevier2
Impact Rookie
 
sevier2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 539
Re: Post game Packers

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok View Post
We'll take it and the W
Exactly. Sure, the coaches/players can go back and focus on where they need to improve but when I, a fan, see a Skins win I'm generally pleased and satisfied. I could care less about the individual stats.
__________________
This is an environment of welcoming and you should just get the hell out of here.
sevier2 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 09-24-2018, 12:13 PM   #107
FrenchSkin
Playmaker
 
FrenchSkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 4,525
Re: Post game Packers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schneed10 View Post
I think it's important that we get it right regarding #91. He's one of our best players and I don't want to see him disrespected on here.

Watch this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OK3IgwknNs

Please jump to the following times:

2:03 - pressure on Rodgers
5:41 - pressure on Rodgers around the edge, Rodgers being Rodgers escapes
8:13 - pancakes his guy in one second, but Rodgers gets rid of it on a 3 step drop
8:21 - busts through and draws a blatant hold

And not pictured here was at least one other blatant holding call where he destroyed the tackle off the ball and all the tackle could do was clothesline him around the neck.

When you guys watch football, don't just watch the results of the play. Don't just follow the ball with your eyes. Watch the trench play, see who's winning and gaining leverage. It's a better indicator of how the game will go overall.

When PFF puts out their evaluation of Kerrigan in this game you'll see he got plenty of pressures.

I thought we were a smarter fan base than this. I'm glad to see at least some of you on here still are. Kerrigan not only didn't play poorly, he played well.
The one at 8:13 is F'in incredible ! Looks like some middle school highlights were a grown up kid destroys normal kids!

The hold at 8:21 is beyond holding, it's a wrestling move.

I think Kerrigan is having a way better beginning of season than last year. What are his grades against the run though? That would be my only knock on his piece of work.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KI Skins Fan
[...] Improbably, that sack came from Ryan Anderson, Frenchy's adopted son. [...]
Haha I see you KI, I see you ! If you push, I'll turn this into my gimmick: Ryan Anderson future HOF, you saw it here first (and nowhere else ever probably) !

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231
[...] Also Mason Foster gets so overlooked...he's been really solid so far.
I've been a Foster lover for 3 seasons, but this year he's on fire!

I really have no worries about our D. They've played really well across the board for 3 weeks.

7 of the 10 points and 64 of the 240 passing yards we allowed yesterday came on a blown coverage between Norman and Swearinger (think it's on DJ though, isn't it?).
Second week in a row this happens though (Hilton TD last week), if this can be corrected and avoider against the Saints, we'll be fine!
__________________
Derz Ambassaderz in the Land of the Rising Sun. Oui Monsieur.
FrenchSkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2018, 12:23 PM   #108
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,043
Re: Post game Packers

Adrian Peterson is fifth in the league for rushing yards at 236 yards, 4.2 ypc.

20 yards ahead of somebody named Saquon Barkley


Ballin
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2018, 01:03 PM   #109
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 38
Posts: 36,192
Re: Post game Packers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schneed10 View Post
I think it's important that we get it right regarding #91. He's one of our best players and I don't want to see him disrespected on here.

Watch this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OK3IgwknNs

Please jump to the following times:

2:03 - pressure on Rodgers
5:41 - pressure on Rodgers around the edge, Rodgers being Rodgers escapes
8:13 - pancakes his guy in one second, but Rodgers gets rid of it on a 3 step drop
8:21 - busts through and draws a blatant hold

And not pictured here was at least one other blatant holding call where he destroyed the tackle off the ball and all the tackle could do was clothesline him around the neck.

When you guys watch football, don't just watch the results of the play. Don't just follow the ball with your eyes. Watch the trench play, see who's winning and gaining leverage. It's a better indicator of how the game will go overall.

When PFF puts out their evaluation of Kerrigan in this game you'll see he got plenty of pressures.

I thought we were a smarter fan base than this. I'm glad to see at least some of you on here still are. Kerrigan not only didn't play poorly, he played well.
We already have on the website.

He graded 2nd in Total pass rush grade . (60.4) Grade behind Matt I (66.3)
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2018, 01:09 PM   #110
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 38
Posts: 36,192
Re: Post game Packers

Kerrigan was on the field for 58 snaps and 41 of those was a pass rush and 3 of those resulted in a pressure all of which where hurries as I said earlier today.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2018, 01:29 PM   #111
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
Re: Post game Packers

Great all-around win. I'm slightly concerned about our rushing defense still in the fact it seems like the other teams get 0 yards or 12. I'd love to see them be a little more consistent in that. Overall, defense is vastly improved...

For all the questions about Doctson, does anyone else feel like the balls throw to him seem really inaccurate? Like, it's almost where it's just bad luck or something. It's like Smith seems accurate to everyone else and then throws a little bit out of reach of Doctson. Maybe he needs to start sacrificing enough to Jobu?

__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2018, 01:30 PM   #112
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
Re: Post game Packers

Did anyone else watch the Colts/Eagles game? Just wondered if their defensive line worked the Eagles like they did ours? Really trying to nail down how that all happened and hope it was just a scheme thing.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2018, 01:31 PM   #113
Kope
Special Teams
 
Kope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 447
Re: Post game Packers

Another point to support Kerrigan: Scheme. I would wager with Allen, Payne and Matt I, the scheme for the week called for him to keep a gimpy Rodgers in the pocket. I think it worked for the most part.
Kope is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2018, 01:33 PM   #114
Kope
Special Teams
 
Kope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 447
Re: Post game Packers

The PI and defensive holding penalties all seemed like pretty fair calls. That to me is a good offense making its own luck. You could look at those as forced penalties.
Kope is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2018, 01:37 PM   #115
ethat001
Impact Rookie
 
ethat001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 920
Re: Post game Packers

Quote:
When you look at the raw stats, you think Washington did great against the pass but struggled to stop the run. So far this season, teams have had more success on the ground than many predicted. But you have to put it all in context: By playing lighter in the box, Washington is challenging the opposing offense to try to push around its defensive linemen and linebackers to take advantage. And for the most part, the front seven is holding up so well that Washington doesn’t have to bring a safety forward. It helps the team allow fewer explosive plays in the passing game. The trade-off is a few more rushing yards, but not enough for it to matter.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sport...=.2f45305e5224
MalcomConnection -- This is a great article about the rush D. Makes sense, we finally have big studs on DL / front 7 so we don't need to sacrifice secondary into the box. So if we wanted to stop the run, we could load up the box, but if we want to primarily stop the pass (on Rodgers and all the elite passers coming in) - we just go "light" in the box. Hope it continues, we have a string of QB studs coming in soon..
ethat001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2018, 01:37 PM   #116
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 38
Posts: 36,192
Re: Post game Packers

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection View Post
Did anyone else watch the Colts/Eagles game? Just wondered if their defensive line worked the Eagles like they did ours? Really trying to nail down how that all happened and hope it was just a scheme thing.
They played the eagles tough all game, made wentz look bad at times. Grades aren't up yet but the Colts D is much improved from last yr.
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2018, 02:01 PM   #117
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,043
Re: Post game Packers

http://www.espn.com/nfl/qbr/_/week/1

Im into some stats today...total QBR for the season:

Alex at a very respectable 10

Cousins 14

Eli 19

Dak at a very garbage 28

Jimmy G was terrible before his injury ranking 30 in the league right behind Bradford who was ranked 29.

You know whats crazy?

Baker Mayfield had the second highest QBR performance of the year with his comeback vs the Jets. had a 95.5 QBR for his play in that game.
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2018, 02:50 PM   #118
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
Re: Post game Packers

Quote:
Originally Posted by ethat001 View Post
MalcomConnection -- This is a great article about the rush D. Makes sense, we finally have big studs on DL / front 7 so we don't need to sacrifice secondary into the box. So if we wanted to stop the run, we could load up the box, but if we want to primarily stop the pass (on Rodgers and all the elite passers coming in) - we just go "light" in the box. Hope it continues, we have a string of QB studs coming in soon..
Ahh, excellent, thanks!
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2018, 02:50 PM   #119
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
Re: Post game Packers

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok View Post
They played the eagles tough all game, made wentz look bad at times. Grades aren't up yet but the Colts D is much improved from last yr.
Good to know. And the Eagles offensive line is no joke either...
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2018, 03:03 PM   #120
jamf
Pro Bowl
 
jamf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,354
Re: Post game Packers

How about some love for Bergstrom?
No botched snaps and didn't get exposed out there.
jamf is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.18624 seconds with 12 queries