new thread probation

MTK · 02-07-2008, 10:10 AM

Seems like the quality of new threads around here lately has been subpar at best. Too many duplicates, and too many worthless threads to put it bluntly.

In response to this please be aware that posting new threads is a privilege, one that will be taken away if you can't follow two simple guidelines.

#1, before you post you really need to review the first page of threads on whatever forum you are posting on. (Sometimes when there is breaking news duplicates happen and that's understandable and I wouldn't penalize someone for that. Also, I'm not talking about similar topics that may have taken place weeks or months ago. A duplicate is an obvious repeated thread, usually some sort of news and it's right there in plain sight on the first page of threads.)

#2 don't waste our time with whatever mindless thought is running through your head at the moment. Think before you post, try to imagine what type of discussion your thread will generate. Is it going to be meaningful discussion, or mindless banter? If it's the latter please don't bother.

Again, posting new threads is a privilege, one that will be taken away if you can't follow the two simple guidelines outlined above. This "new thread probation" as I call it has actually been in place for a while, I just thought it was time to make everyone aware of the possible consequences of repeatedly posting duplicate or worthless threads.

If your new thread privileges get taken away, it's for good. Sorry, no second chances.

Any questions let me know.

WillH · 02-07-2008, 10:20 AM

DUMB THREAD!

JK, But seriously thanks Matty, it has been pretty bad lately.

v3n0m · 02-07-2008, 10:30 AM

Man! it's a free country !

RobH4413 · 02-07-2008, 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WillH

DUMB THREAD!

JK, But seriously thanks Matty, it has been pretty bad lately.

Jesus Christ.... Why are you up?

1.00$ bourbon and cokes and your up at 9:00?

Yeah, everyone knows I like to jump on people about this... It's just annoying when people put little/no effort and then post something totally irrelevant just to be on the main page. Like... congrats.

We were all Newbs... just be easy on the lazy threads.

Campbell17 · 02-07-2008, 10:30 AM

I guess you wont hear many threads by me for a while...

EARTHQUAKE2689 · 02-07-2008, 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Campbell17

I guess you wont hear many threads by me for a while...

We both know that is not true. But this might finally stop people from making dumb threads.

Redskins · 02-07-2008, 02:20 PM

How about implementing a system where a Mod can approve the start of the tread before it posts instead of assuming that every single user will be able to follow this direction. It would be easier if a handful of people patrolled the masses, not to mention Mods have a better idea of what has already been (and will be) posted.

EARTHQUAKE2689 · 02-07-2008, 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redskins

How about implementing a system where a Mod can approve the start of the tread before it posts instead of assuming that every single user will be able to follow this direction. It would be easier if a handful of people patrolled the masses, not to mention Mods have a better idea of what has already been (and will be) posted.

then the mods would get like tons of messages then they would have to read every single one and the aprrove or disapprove them. I wouldnt wish that on my worst enemy

Redskins · 02-08-2008, 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

then the mods would get like tons of messages then they would have to read every single one and the aprrove or disapprove them. I wouldnt wish that on my worst enemy

Read it again. "Start of the thread", not each individual response to a thread. I doubt there are so many threads started each day that it would overwhelm anyone, except maybe those bored with the content. Obviously asking a MOD to review and approve/disapprove each individual response would be overwhelming.

Campbell17 · 02-07-2008, 10:31 AM

Hey at least it gives Schneed something to do during the off season.

Daseal · 02-07-2008, 11:05 AM

Matty,

One thing that has confused me is that someone may post a speculation thread, then 70 posts in someone posts what actually happens to the story. Do you consider it a 2ndary thread when a speculation thread is answered definitively in a new thread?

MTK · 02-07-2008, 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daseal

Matty,

One thing that has confused me is that someone may post a speculation thread, then 70 posts in someone posts what actually happens to the story. Do you consider it a 2ndary thread when a speculation thread is answered definitively in a new thread?

I'm not following you, can you give an example?

SmootSmack · 02-07-2008, 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daseal

Matty,

One thing that has confused me is that someone may post a speculation thread, then 70 posts in someone posts what actually happens to the story. Do you consider it a 2ndary thread when a speculation thread is answered definitively in a new thread?

I think what you're saying is something like "Rumor: Williams to Jacksonville" and then somehwere in that thread someone posts link and says "It's official guys" and then meanwhile, another thread is created that says "NFL Network: Gregg Williams Signs with Jacksonville"

Is that the type of scenario you're talking about?

MTK · 02-07-2008, 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

I think what you're saying is something like "Rumor: Williams to Jacksonville" and then somehwere in that thread someone posts link and says "It's official guys" and then meanwhile, another thread is created that says "NFL Network: Gregg Williams Signs with Jacksonville"

Is that the type of scenario you're talking about?

Ok I got it, in that case I wouldn't call it a duplicate. I mean it is, but that's not the problem I'm trying to address here.

Longtimefan · 02-07-2008, 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Ok I got it, in that case I wouldn't call it a duplicate. I mean it is, but that's not the problem I'm trying to address here.

Matty, maybe you should take just a moment to give a few examples of just what is considered a "worthless thread" It has become apearent that the people who post these type threads don't know the difference.

I think one previous poster gave some examples of the type threads you're refering too, but they would be better served hearing it from you.

02-07-2008, 10:30 AM	#3
v3n0m Camp Scrub Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 9	Re: new thread probation Man! it's a free country !

02-07-2008, 10:30 AM	#5
Campbell17 Impact Rookie Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Haddonfield, NJ Age: 31 Posts: 642	Re: new thread probation I guess you wont hear many threads by me for a while... __________________ This time instead of some lousy joke, humerous comment, racial slur, or a famous quote, I will write small, and be the bigger person.

02-07-2008, 02:20 PM	#7
Redskins Camp Scrub Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 48	Re: new thread probation How about implementing a system where a Mod can approve the start of the tread before it posts instead of assuming that every single user will be able to follow this direction. It would be easier if a handful of people patrolled the masses, not to mention Mods have a better idea of what has already been (and will be) posted.

02-07-2008, 10:31 AM	#10
Campbell17 Impact Rookie Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Haddonfield, NJ Age: 31 Posts: 642	Re: new thread probation Hey at least it gives Schneed something to do during the off season. __________________ This time instead of some lousy joke, humerous comment, racial slur, or a famous quote, I will write small, and be the bigger person.

02-07-2008, 11:05 AM	#11
Daseal Puppy Kicker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, Virginia Age: 41 Posts: 8,341	Re: new thread probation Matty, One thing that has confused me is that someone may post a speculation thread, then 70 posts in someone posts what actually happens to the story. Do you consider it a 2ndary thread when a speculation thread is answered definitively in a new thread? __________________ Best. Player. Available.

02-07-2008, 10:10 AM	#1
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: NY Age: 52 Posts: 99,464	new thread probation Seems like the quality of new threads around here lately has been subpar at best. Too many duplicates, and too many worthless threads to put it bluntly. In response to this please be aware that posting new threads is a privilege, one that will be taken away if you can't follow two simple guidelines. #1, before you post you really need to review the first page of threads on whatever forum you are posting on. (Sometimes when there is breaking news duplicates happen and that's understandable and I wouldn't penalize someone for that. Also, I'm not talking about similar topics that may have taken place weeks or months ago. A duplicate is an obvious repeated thread, usually some sort of news and it's right there in plain sight on the first page of threads.) #2 don't waste our time with whatever mindless thought is running through your head at the moment. Think before you post, try to imagine what type of discussion your thread will generate. Is it going to be meaningful discussion, or mindless banter? If it's the latter please don't bother. Again, posting new threads is a privilege, one that will be taken away if you can't follow the two simple guidelines outlined above. This "new thread probation" as I call it has actually been in place for a while, I just thought it was time to make everyone aware of the possible consequences of repeatedly posting duplicate or worthless threads. If your new thread privileges get taken away, it's for good. Sorry, no second chances. Any questions let me know. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

02-07-2008, 10:20 AM	#2
WillH The Starter Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 1,590	Re: new thread probation DUMB THREAD! JK, But seriously thanks Matty, it has been pretty bad lately.

new thread probation

Playbook