Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Warpath > Board Management > Thread Hell


Brunell

Thread Hell


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-09-2007, 12:09 AM   #1
wilsowilso
Registered User
 
wilsowilso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 50
Posts: 2,841
Brunell

Can anyone please explain to me how his signing helped the organization. He is Joe Gibb's great mistake. He is my worst nightmare as a Redskin fan. That is how I feel. He got about 25 million more than he ever deserved. No offense, but try to prove me wrong and I will make you look like an idiot. Remember two years out of three he has been the field general of a bad bad bad bad very bad bad overpaid team. I hope he opts out and tests the market, but I promise you he won't. If he does then I will change my mind. Otherwise he is a curse to the team. IMO.
wilsowilso is offline  
Old 02-09-2007, 12:12 AM   #2
Redskins_P
Fight for old DC!
 
Redskins_P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 46
Posts: 4,101
Re: Brunell

Redskins_P is offline  
Old 02-09-2007, 12:21 AM   #3
wilsowilso
Registered User
 
wilsowilso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 50
Posts: 2,841
Re: Brunell

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskins_P View Post

I am saying straight up Brunell is the worst worst and ultimately worst mistake of the last decade at least. I just wanted to say that.
wilsowilso is offline  
Old 02-09-2007, 12:23 AM   #4
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Brunell

Quote:
Originally Posted by wilsowilso View Post
I am saying straight up Brunell is the worst worst and ultimately worst mistake of the last decade at least. I just wanted to say that.
Okay, that's a pretty ridiculous statement.

I'm going to hear you out though. Make your case...
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline  
Old 02-09-2007, 12:27 AM   #5
wilsowilso
Registered User
 
wilsowilso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 50
Posts: 2,841
Re: Brunell

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Okay, that's a pretty ridiculous statement.

I'm going to hear you out though. Make your case...
Alright it will take a second.
wilsowilso is offline  
Old 02-09-2007, 01:32 AM   #6
wilsowilso
Registered User
 
wilsowilso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 50
Posts: 2,841
Re: Brunell

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Okay, that's a pretty ridiculous statement.

I'm going to hear you out though. Make your case...
Should I start with the contract that was so way way over the top that it made the management team look like fools. That wasn't a good idea for the rest of the league to to think we are a team willing to pay big money for garbage. Remind me how that was good for us?
wilsowilso is offline  
Old 02-09-2007, 01:43 AM   #7
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Brunell

Quote:
Originally Posted by wilsowilso View Post
Should I start with the contract that was so way way over the top that it made the management team look like fools. That wasn't a good idea for the rest of the league to to think we are a team willing to pay big money for garbage. Remind me how that was good for us?
It wasn't. It wasnt in the case of Brunell, or any of these guys:

Antwaan Randle El
Andre Carter
Adam Archuleta
Brandon Lloyd
David Patten

I still don't see how you can think that Brunell was the worst acquistion Gibbs has made.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline  
Old 02-09-2007, 09:48 AM   #8
firstdown
Living Legend
 
firstdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
Re: Brunell

Quote:
Originally Posted by wilsowilso View Post
Should I start with the contract that was so way way over the top that it made the management team look like fools. That wasn't a good idea for the rest of the league to to think we are a team willing to pay big money for garbage. Remind me how that was good for us?
You said Brunell was bad now your pointing to his contract thats another story.So make your case about Brunell he can't help what they paid him or maybe he should have said thats too much money I'm only worth Blank.
firstdown is offline  
Old 02-09-2007, 01:43 AM   #9
jamf
Pro Bowl
 
jamf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,183
Re: Brunell

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskins_P View Post
Oh Barbaro
jamf is offline  
Old 02-09-2007, 01:50 AM   #10
70Chip
Playmaker
 
70Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manassas
Age: 53
Posts: 3,048
Re: Brunell

I like him as a backup. He could come in for a game or two. Knows the system. He would have fresh legs, fresh arm. They certainly can't have Collins as the main backup.
__________________
This Monkey's Gone to Heaven
70Chip is offline  
Old 02-09-2007, 01:56 AM   #11
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Brunell

Quote:
Originally Posted by 70Chip View Post
I like him as a backup. He could come in for a game or two. Knows the system. He would have fresh legs, fresh arm. They certainly can't have Collins as the main backup.
I would cut Collins. You save almost as much cap room as you would cutting Brunell and you get twice the QB. We can go bargain basement with the 3rd stringer, like a system college QB/clipboard holder (UDFA), or we can follow the new trend and only take 2 QBs into the season.

Either way, its a better option then restructuring for that 1.5 mil, thats for sure.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline  
Old 02-09-2007, 02:04 AM   #12
70Chip
Playmaker
 
70Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manassas
Age: 53
Posts: 3,048
Re: Brunell

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
I would cut Collins. You save almost as much cap room as you would cutting Brunell and you get twice the QB. We can go bargain basement with the 3rd stringer, like a system college QB/clipboard holder (UDFA), or we can follow the new trend and only take 2 QBs into the season.

Either way, its a better option then restructuring for that 1.5 mil, thats for sure.

Yeah, I like that. I wonder how strong the Saunders/Collins marriage is though? Saunders might balk. But, he's just the OC. Like it or lump it. Take it down the street and dump it.

I would like to get a 3rd QB, though. Just for developmental reasons. I think the arena league is a good training ground. They have to get rid of it so fast, which is the direction the NFL has gone. Quick, quick quick. Beathard would have been all over that arena league grabbing talent.
__________________
This Monkey's Gone to Heaven
70Chip is offline  
Old 02-09-2007, 12:12 AM   #13
Pocket$ $traight
Registered User
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 4,261
Re: Brunell

Quote:
Originally Posted by wilsowilso View Post
Can anyone please explain to me how his signing helped the organization. He is Joe Gibb's great mistake. He is my worst nightmare as a Redskin fan. That is how I feel. He got about 25 million more than he ever deserved. No offense, but try to prove me wrong and I will make you look like an idiot. Remember two years out of three he has been the field general of a bad bad bad bad very bad bad overpaid team. I hope he opts out and tests the market, but I promise you he won't. If he does then I will change my mind. Otherwise he is a curse to the team. IMO.
I cannot. They could have signed him for almost nothing and there have been so many Free Agents who would have been better. Garcia is just one name that comes to mind and I don't like him at all.
Pocket$ $traight is offline  
Old 02-09-2007, 12:32 AM   #14
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Brunell

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grim21Reaper View Post
I cannot. They could have signed him for almost nothing and there have been so many Free Agents who would have been better. Garcia is just one name that comes to mind and I don't like him at all.
The pissing away of the 3rd rounder was pretty unesscessary. But IMO (and everyone elses) that doesnt make him the worst move ever, considering we've done that pretty much every year.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline  
Old 02-09-2007, 12:14 AM   #15
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Brunell

Quote:
Originally Posted by wilsowilso View Post
Can anyone please explain to me how his signing helped the organization. He is Joe Gibb's great mistake. He is my worst nightmare as a Redskin fan. That is how I feel. He got about 25 million more than he ever deserved. No offense, but try to prove me wrong and I will make you look like an idiot. Remember two years out of three he has been the field general of a bad bad bad bad very bad bad overpaid team. I hope he opts out and tests the market, but I promise you he won't. If he does then I will change my mind. Otherwise he is a curse to the team. IMO.
OK, I'll bite, but why don't you state your case first on why he is worse than the Duckett trade, the Lloyd trade, the Archuleta signing, and even the Carter signing. These moves were pretty clearly worse, so I'm interested in your arguement.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.21648 seconds with 9 queries