[3MiamiDade21egend6]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

What is your basis for this conclusion? Sports medicine is a well developed field. Experts conduct research and regularly provide testimony and reports based on that research in the area all the time. Sarcasm aside, I believe your assertion to be false and, at best, speculative. I would post links demonstrating the falsity of your assertion, but I am at work and have access issses.



I would? And how would you prove this lack of competence?

Facts and expert analysis are absolutely relevant as to whether the Skins staff is incompetent. The question of "competence" is determined by whether or not the techniques, methods and practices of the Redskins trainers conform the standards within the industry. Are they performing the required tests? Are they taking the steps indicated by medical professionals who analyze these things for a living, etc.

Do you have any medical training? Do you know the standards within the industry? Can you tell me what, specifically, the Skins trainers are not doing which trainers in professional leagues are doing and should be doing? If not, you're conclusion that the Skins' trainers are incompetent is, again, base speculation.

You want to believe they are incompetent? Fine. In doing so, however, and without comparative facts or expert opinions, you are simply giving an uniformed opinion.

You, of course, are free to talk out your ass all you like. Your attempt to defend your speculative opinions by asserting that informed opinions can't be made, however, is, at best, wrong and, at worst, ignorant.

You are quick to back "expert analysis" as a proven method of judging an individual group. There are two problems with that assumption: the first is that the group represents a fraction of the overall results of said analysis. The second problem is that the analysis given has been provided within a profitable organization, which is more often than not a biased result for desired appearances/image of the organization. Not that any of that matters, as you are determining my hypothesis, which I have not proven to be correct, to be wildly inaccurate and highly speculative without providing evidence of your own to the contrary. You might also notice, upon further review, that I am questioning the competency of this staff without actually calling them otherwise.