Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus
Three strikes, you're out.
|
Like most of your comments that wasn't a strike. Also, you weren't appointed Ump so I'm still very '
In'.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus
I asked a simple, basic question about the ethical basis for the system of justice you are proposing.
|
Which I answered: Whatever 'we're' currently using. Why do you refuse to accept the answer?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus
Three times you have failed to offer an intelligent response. Obviously you have not at all thought through the very foundation of your system.
|
Again, I responded. Oh, and by the way; you can't count.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus
The fact is, Monksdown was correct above. The fact is that you cannot simply turn ethical decisions into mathematical equations. Anyone who knows anything about ethics knows this fact.
|
Do we have any ethics experts here? Any math experts? My theory is sound even without evidence.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus
I suggest that before you start pontificating again about making ethics into quantifiable equations, you first learn the basics about what ethical theory is all about.
|
Feel free to make any suggestions you like, you're not any kind of authority here so I'll continue to theorize to entertain myself and you can mock away.