Quote:
Originally Posted by RedskinRat
<SNIP>
__________________________________________________ _______
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeRedskin 
The concepts of “right” and “wrong” are not mathematical equations based on data retrieval.
They can very easily be made so.
__________________________________________________ _______
To clarify, as you're not following along, we currently have laws and we can convert a law and the breach of the law to a formula. At no point did I or anyone else mention ethics.
You're deliberately introducing a derailing topic.
|
Actually ethics were mentioned in several posts, including by you in at least post 444.
And talking about ethics is hardly "derailing" a discussion about how the legal system should work. Ethical principles supply foundational notions of law and justice. In fact, we can't even define the word "justice" without availing ourselves of ethical principles. So, for example, definition #1 of "justice" in the Oxford English Dictionary is "The quality of being (morally) just or righteous; the principle of just dealing; the exhibition of this quality or principle in action; just conduct; integrity, rectitude. (One of the four cardinal virtues.)."
Therefore, since you claim to have a superior system of justice, you are also involved in ethics. A discussion of ethics goes right to the heart of your claims, whether you like it or not.
But you still haven't responded to my question.