Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012
Racial component retracted, on the grounds of being not necessary to the argument.
|
I'm glad for you.
Quote:
This is not a court of law, and Andrew Luck is everything I have suggested he is. Your best argument remains "I disagree." Except here's the thing: you don't disagree. You agree with me. You just think you're justified to put Tannehill in his tier. And by your own extension, Kaepernick. Which I don't think can be justified. Maybe it can. But you haven't been particularly convincing despite carrying the burden of proof.
I want to keep this from drifting into an analysis of Andrew Luck's combine results. If you actually are going to make the case that Andrew Luck's combine results suggest he's not one of the better athletes to come out in years at the QB position, I'll probably respond (if I can) to your case. If you're not going to make it, drop the argument.
|
Dude, you're all over the place.
Quote:
|
I will stand on just the skin deep comparison to Newton, and the similarity/superiority to Griffin in the non-running tests. I have little intention of analyzing combine numbers for their greater meaning, and yet, still feel very comfortable concluding that we don't see athletes like Luck at the QB position very often.
|
lol, right now that the numbers are posted you're backpedalling.
Quote:
|
But, I guess I should expect this from you since for whatever reason you cannot admit that Tannehill is a better athlete then Luck.
|
Of course the above statement cannot be supported.
But neither can this statement:
Quote:
|
Of course Andrew Luck is a better athlete than Tannehill.
|
A better statement would be that for whatever reason you choose to diminish Tannehill athletic accomplishments yet overstate Lucks.
-Cheers