Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk
I'd have no problem with that myself.
I'd lean toward the plan being taking BPA at 6, and trading back into the first to take RT.
|
Unless you can get a good price to trade up into the top three, I think this is probably the best way to play it.
I have a bunch of guys ranked ahead of Tannehill who were more accomplished college players, but I'd understand those who prefer what RT does well. His skill set is fairly unique. He doesn't really fit what we currently do, but we could become a Ryan Tannehill offense with very little tweaking of the offense. It would just require drastically different gameplanning with pretty much the same playsheet.
The infrastructure to be a good offense with Tannehill is already in place.