Quote:
Originally Posted by biffle
Yeah, you kind of did. None of those trades you mention have the trading up teams giving up as much as you have us doing, save for the Leaf fiasco.
If next year's first was considered to have the value of this year's second, then we would be giving up more than the full price of the value chart without giving up the two 4ths you include. And every organiztion worth anything realizes a future 1st is worth more than that.
|
The other two were trades where they had 0 leverage so the pick was devalued. Now you have a situation where there are multiple teams wanting the pick, and without the huge contracts that rookies used to get. That pick has now become more valuable than it was prior.
2012 -1st
2012-3rd
2012- 4th
2013-1st
2013- 5th
----------------------------
2012-1st
2012-2nd
2013- 1st
2013- 4th
---------------
My scenario was a estimation, and it wasn't overblown that much even though you think it is. I can see several packages like the one above given for that pick.
The Panther's traded their 2010 1st rounder for a 2009 2nd round pick (43rd) worth 470 points.
You want to know why it cost the Chargers so much to move from #3 to #2? It was because of the person at stake. At the time, Leaf was perceived to have a higher ceiling than Peyton.
Fast forward to now. RGIII is also being touted as a top prospect along with Luck and is said to have a higher ceiling. He's obviously good enough for Irsay to mention both him and Luck.
Put that #2 up for bid, and the price could sky rocket if teams start a bidding war. If you want to argue about me adding an additional 4th or 5th to the chart, than by all means haggle away. It was a rough estimate, but it was enough to show that we dont' want to give up that much for one guy.