Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud
I think at some point (a point which has probably already been reached) both parties need to stop playing tug of war and just be okay with where they are in the agreement. It should be measures of compromise for both the players and owners. It shouldn't be about which side "won."
If the one side's reaction to getting a concession from the other side is to immediately ask for more, we'll go back and forth forever.
|
Thats exactly my point. Be happy that progress is being made and compromise. Why wouldn't all this BS have been brought out on the table at the beginning to be apart of the negotiations? It's like what out of the blue they all of a sudden remembered they want another 300 mill plus for something else? Or were the players waiting to see how much money they could swindle during the negotiations and depending on that depended on whether they asked for the extra 300 mill?
The owners are just as much at fault. I'm just wondering if it's the lawyers giving ideas at this point.