[30gut]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

I don't think I'm discounting Moss' production when I say that the passing offense accomplished what it did last year largely independent of Moss. Just that our results on passes to Moss weren't any better (they were actually a bit worse) than our results on passes to all other players.

Your gonna have to explain this one.
Why do think the above, especially the bolded portion?

So if we lose that production when Moss leaves...we're still left with pretty much everything that our passing game accomplished last year, minus one semi-useful movable piece.

How can we lose Moss production without also losing his impact that creates favorable opportunities for other receivers?

Your basically saying that we can lose Moss without missing a beat.

But, you also didn't respond to my other main point.
Adding the young WRs to a group that already includes Moss is how you build a possibly dynamic receiving corps.
Removing Moss is creates a receiving corps that you hope can match the production from last year.

I would rather shoot for a dynamic receiving then corps then aim to match last years production.

I would rather the young receivers replace Joey Galloway and Roydell Williams then the young receivers to attempt to replace Moss.