Quote:
Originally Posted by Alvin Walton
This is all a bunch of horsehockey....we're not trading up.
|
I'd love to agree with you on this, but like I said in that other thread. 3 out of 3 insiders I know of on other forums have all said the exact same thing Smoot has.
We were willing to trade our #10 and next years #1 and #3 to move up to to the #2. That #3 in the 2012 could be a #4 instead according to Smoot. They stated Gabbert, then Locker.
I wouldn't be upset with them picking Locker at the #10 spot, but giving up next years #1 and #3 (or #4 whichever it is) is ****ing insane.