Quote:
Originally Posted by BigHairedAristocrat
i dont see how PFT took any liberties with what was in the ESPN article. they both basically said the same thing. what am i missing?
|
your right, i read both articles, made my comment. read your comment, re-read both articles and they do say pretty much the same thing. the titles of the article show a contrast. espn title: he wants to be in the mix. PFT article: he wants to start. when i clicked on the PFT article the first time i expected him to say he wants to start for the skins. clicking on the espn article he says he definetly thinks he can be a starter again.
i would say PFT did dangle a misleading cliff-hanging title there, but i was wrong.