|
Re: Redskins Select Jarmon in 3rd Round of Supplemental Draft
Quote:
Originally Posted by GridIron26
I can't really say anything to support or be against this move because I have none on this guy beside the reports on him I read.. However, I would have to look at this move as a positive sign for our FO; the reason why we drafted Jarmon is to replace Phillips and Wynn after the 2010 season.. Which is something we rarely do.. I hope the FO will continue this trend..
I guess I can say I'm in waiting-to-see-what-happens mode (pretty much same as everyone else) but I don't think it would be a bust pick for us.. I'm not saying that Jarmon would rise to a great or star player, but I believe he will rise to level where he is serviceable as #1 LDE for years.. Or more..
|
GI, you could say that again! Your reason is the same reason I haven't brought myself to vote in this poll.
I've been checking the 2010 Draft that Dirtbag posted. I didn't see Jarmon.
http://www.thewarpath.net/nfl-draft-...aft-depth.html.
Of course all of those players would have been 1st rounders, and Jarmon is a 3rd.
All SEC isn't chopped liver, but is it good for a 3rd? Maybe I'll withhold any judgement until TC and pre-season!
__________________
'37, '42, '83, '88, '92. Championship!
|