View Single Post
Old 05-01-2009, 04:05 PM   #22
Slingin Sammy 33
Playmaker
 
Slingin Sammy 33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
Re: Celtics vs. Bulls

Quote:
Originally Posted by hooskins View Post
Sick of the Bulls? I never got that argument. Sure they were great during Jordan but the Celtics are the most dominant franchise in the NBA, EVER. More championships than anyone with 17! They won EIGHT straight in the 60's and have won 2-3 each decade since(Except 90's). This decade it has only been one, but that is one more than the Bulls.

Bulls only dominated in the 90's winning 3 in a row twice. But that is it! Boston has been a whole heck of a lot more dominate since the 50's. Unless you only account for the 90's you can't be "sick" of the Bulls. If you really want to says Bulls have been dominant in the NBA you MUST be comprehensive and Celtics have shown they can win consistently throughout time.
This was mostly a zing at Quake.

But, I'm a huge Celtic fan since the mid-70s so I know the history very well. My son's godfather is from Chicago and a huge Bulls fan. Needless to say listening to the Jordan and Bulls crap for the better part of a decade got pretty old. I can't stand Jordan either.

Although I do like these Bulls, Rose, Gordon and Heinrich are a great backcourt. They find a big man (Stoudamire??) and they'll be a force for several years.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996.
Slingin Sammy 33 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.80719 seconds with 10 queries