View Single Post
Old 03-01-2009, 01:46 PM   #24
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,702
Re: Room for disappointment in FA?

I am very happy (in fact I probably qualify as a head over heals guy). I think adding a HIGH quality DT, we increased our depth because our starters Golston and Montgomery now add to the rotation. On the offensive line, I would have been disappointed but the Lions/Bills incompetence and our FO's willingness to get Dock gives meaning to our draft, because now we know our left side is a lot more solid, we can focus on a center/rg/ot. and again, our starters last year become our depth, not bad. Not really thrilled with Hall but Rodgers/Hall/Landry ought to be a heck of a starting defensive backfield.

If we upgrade our special teams (ie punter) and the kid from Canada who I don't remember can take over punt returns. I would think there would be no solid reason to be disappointed in the offseason.

Of Course there is always the regular season available for disappointments to shine through. For now I continue to give our FO a solid :

Last edited by CRedskinsRule; 03-01-2009 at 01:56 PM.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.51102 seconds with 10 queries