Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

sportscurmudgeon · 03-15-2008, 05:45 PM

Darrell Jackson is a gamble.

He has had injuries - - to his legs. Not good for a WR.

He was let go by the Niners who signed Isaac Bruce to take his job. Bruce is way over the hill.

BUT, if Jackson is healthy and it was his health that made him expendable on a truly bad team in SF, then he's worth a shot. But the FO can't invest their ego in this signing. If he comes in and doesn't cut it, then they have to cut him.

BOTTOM LINE: If he'd sign a two year deal - with a TEAM option on year three for sensible money - I'd sign him and give him a shot.

03-15-2008, 05:45 PM	#1
sportscurmudgeon Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 3,159	Re: Darrell Jackson? Darrell Jackson is a gamble. He has had injuries - - to his legs. Not good for a WR. He was let go by the Niners who signed Isaac Bruce to take his job. Bruce is way over the hill. BUT, if Jackson is healthy and it was his health that made him expendable on a truly bad team in SF, then he's worth a shot. But the FO can't invest their ego in this signing. If he comes in and doesn't cut it, then they have to cut him. BOTTOM LINE: If he'd sign a two year deal - with a TEAM option on year three for sensible money - I'd sign him and give him a shot. __________________ The Sports Curmudgeon www.sportscurmudgeon.com But don't get me wrong, I love sports...