Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

JoeRedskin · 03-07-2008, 11:17 PM

Not only that, if they wait until June 1 to cut him (or pre-designate him as a June 1 cut) it's only a 2.3M hit this year and a 4.6M hit in 2009.

Add to that the fact that his cap number in 2008 (per the article and with Canuck's correction for a 5 year salary proration) is 8.212M and cutting him seems like a done deal.

Let me be the first to say it - I'd sign him for the vet minimum.

Actually I wouldn't - I just figured I would get it out of the way).

03-07-2008, 11:17 PM	#21
JoeRedskin Contains football related knowledge Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Second Star On The Right Age: 62 Posts: 10,401	Re: Seahawks Signings Not only that, if they wait until June 1 to cut him (or pre-designate him as a June 1 cut) it's only a 2.3M hit this year and a 4.6M hit in 2009. Add to that the fact that his cap number in 2008 (per the article and with Canuck's correction for a 5 year salary proration) is 8.212M and cutting him seems like a done deal. Let me be the first to say it - I'd sign him for the vet minimum. Actually I wouldn't - I just figured I would get it out of the way). __________________ Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.