Thread: f...gibbs
View Single Post
Old 09-24-2007, 07:49 AM   #4
BrunellMVP?
Impact Rookie
 
BrunellMVP?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 726
Re: f...gibbs

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
F...this thread

We're saying F Gibbs because we went to heavy jumbo at the end of the game? People are upset about this? Yeah, because heavy jumbo has never worked in Redskins history.

We're saying F Gibbs because with the game on the line we didn't put Campbell (who doesn't even have a full season under his belt) in the shotgun so he could call his own plays? Yeah, because Gibbs and Saunders have proven nothing when it comes to playcalling
I think people are just frustrated with the conservative play calling once we get a lead...and lack of execution. Every time we get a lead, we seem to play content...the offense sputters (3 and out) and we end up leaning too heavily on our D. In terms of Gibbs and Saunders having proved nothing- i don't think anyone would say that (that isn't a fool)- but I do think there is something to be said about what they've proven as a tandem calling the shots...
__________________
in writing these daily letters and trying to make them interesting it is always possible that some sentiment may occur which has not received the severe and deliberate scrutiny and reconsideration which should attach to a State Paper.
- Churchill
BrunellMVP? is offline  

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.71324 seconds with 10 queries