Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

MTK · 09-14-2006, 08:22 AM

If you look at his career numbers year by year, it's quite obvious that 2004 sticks out as the real "fluke".

Regardless, as always Brunell takes the brunt of the blame for any loss. I really didn't see him as the main problem on Monday night.

As an offensive unit they were out of sync and didn't play well enough to win. That's not all on his shoulders.

Everyone needs to improve right now, MB included.

But if you think plugging in Campbell is going to radically change things in a positive manner you're sadly mistaken.

09-14-2006, 08:22 AM	#91
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 52 Posts: 99,846	Re: How Long For Brunell? If you look at his career numbers year by year, it's quite obvious that 2004 sticks out as the real "fluke". Regardless, as always Brunell takes the brunt of the blame for any loss. I really didn't see him as the main problem on Monday night. As an offensive unit they were out of sync and didn't play well enough to win. That's not all on his shoulders. Everyone needs to improve right now, MB included. But if you think plugging in Campbell is going to radically change things in a positive manner you're sadly mistaken. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop