View Single Post
Old 08-23-2006, 01:34 AM   #97
onebum
Camp Scrub
 
onebum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The cheap seats, though I always have plans to move to a luxury booth.
Age: 46
Posts: 57
Re: We keep portis, betts, duckett...and rock for specail teams?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG View Post
Young guys with potential make the team if they only play special teams. See L. Marshall and A. Pierce as examples. I would think a guy like Rock does not fit that category.
I agree that young guys with potential make the team if they play special teams AND have prospect for their positions. Thats why you keep the young ones that play Spec Tms, you know what the old guys can do while they young ones you don't know if they will be good or not.

Basically because rock plays special teams he gets a roster spot? There are 3 guys at his position that are better than him. we have 3 others that might be better than him, time will tell. We know what he can do on the field, and he isn't a starting caliber running back in my opinion. The other 6 are either good enough to start or have the potential to be good enough to start and only time will tell, while we know he isn't good enough to start.

3 start worthy, 3 might be's, and 1 we know doesn't have starting talent. If we lose/cut/deal/trade/transfer/reassign/demote/promote betts I think Rock will stick around to play Spec Teams and have his 1-2 carries a game. Its just my opinion that as the RB list stands, Rock is the odd man out.
__________________
Da Bum
onebum is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.79539 seconds with 10 queries