Id be okay with that ... doesnt solve our QB1 problem but Brissett could compliment our 2-1 run offense, probably be better at quick pass play calls, good ball protection and let the D do their thing.
------------------
Carr's most recent extension included the right for the
Raiders to cut him within three days of the Super Bowl for a relatively minor $5.625 salary-cap hit and gave the quarterback a no-trade clause.
Thursday's statement could be seen as taking away the Raiders' leverage in a trade. Carr, whose
contract guarantees him $40 million if he is still with Las Vegas or agrees to a trade before Feb. 15, could simply wait for the Raiders to release him and hit the open market, with Las Vegas getting nothing in return.
Trades cannot become official until March 15. So if the Raiders do find a trade partner for Carr, not only would the quarterback have to agree to the destination, the Raiders would also have to trust that the other team would not back out. So while Carr might find a robust market for his services, his trade value to the Raiders might not be as high as it once was.
https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/...e-raiders-fans
Cant say I fully understand this or seen it before.
Looked up Carrs contract .. what a funky contract. there is little guaranteed money left and its all salary.
Wow what an odd contract.
https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/las-vega...ek-carr-14445/