Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule
https://apnews.com/article/0a6f2a348...5e1dc486027860
I said no in this thread before because the first set of impeachment articles were bogus politics.
Inciting riots is something that the President does not have authority to do. Count me as in favor of these articles of impeachment. ( still not the first set)
|
It might have been a riot to some of the supporters, but you can bet there were insurrections and domestic terrorists in that crowd as well that absolutely would've seized the opportunity to take captives or do worse if the chambers weren't cleared in time. Which is why I have no sympathy for those who did participate.
With that being said I will agree to disagree with you on the first impeachment, but thank you for clarifying your opinion on the second. It's a moot point anyways and I don't think it's going to go anywhere before or after he leaves office, but I respect any conservative willing to stand up to the radicals and say what he did is an impeachable offense.