Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231
He’s one of the top run stopping dline men in the game...this silly logic of only 2 down seems to be the same thing we’ve heard in the past which has lead the defense towards the bottom of the league...especially against the run.
You really have to be a dumb ass franchise to run a base defense 3-4 without a NT. Why not just move to a base 4-3?
It’s ridiculous to watch Bruce and the front office every year make the same mistakes.
Well Chico there only in the base 30% of snaps...yeah I know that and we continue to get gashed 50% of the time no matter which package we are in against the run.
If you use the same logic of 2 down...then you better not spend a first round pick on a 2 down d-tackle.
|
Vea needs work as a pass rusher, Payne is more versatile, he would be my pick personally
Bottom line is do you give a big deal to Hankins for perhaps 20 snaps a game?
Even if you draft Vea his price tag is significantly less than Hankins. The logic here isn't don't sign a two down guy, it's don't sign a two down guy to a contract that's going to put the squeeze on your cap