Quote:
Originally Posted by WillH
Probably because that's what he got last year.
I understand the hesitance to pay for a player that's part of a rotation, but they've got 3 big holes to fill still and only 2 picks in the first 3 rounds. LG, RB, and NT.
The draft has multiple good top end prospects at all of these positions, but less DTs than OGs or RBs.
RB free agent class was weak to begin with. The answer isn't there in FA. So this has to come from the draft. There's 1 of your top 2 picks.
There were some viable starters in FA. They're about dried up at this point, and they were always going to be too expensive considering what you will have to pay BS in the next 2 years. So, there's 2.
DT is the logical place to spend some money in FA. There's talent available, and you can afford it especially if you cut McClain. They'll fill the spot with someone, but I hope it's not another scrub. I assume they're pinching these pennies to resign BS, JC, and PS. Would you take Hankins over any of them? It's a tough call.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
|
Right now I think they are letting the players find the market. Right now Bennie Logan, Hankins and Suh are feeling out the teams, I dont think we want Suh but still he us part of Hankins market value.