Quote:
Originally Posted by over the mountain
I dont think he had established 2 feet down though. In that situation where a receiver catches the ball in the process of falling down, he must maintain control of ball throughout the process of hitting the ground.
|
I agreed with the overturn. At first you were looking if he was touched, and he clearly wasn't. But the ball moved when it hit the ground. Seemed like a good reverse. Too many times this year I thought they erred on the side of a no call when the video was clear.
That said, It's just as hit or miss with the replay, so at this point if they were to do away with it entirely and say the call is the call, I'd be ok with that. Just train the refs better.