Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231
Whether you like "back channels" or not really isn't the issue. I personally don't have a problem with them when dealing with sensitive foreign policy issues.
I guess my point is this, aside from Russia story: What if a story came out today that Trump sent a white house official to Tehran to set up a back channel early in his Presidency? How would that story play in the press today?
|
I don't have a problem with them, the issue at hand is what the back channel is being used for. Same goes for Tehran too. If he was using it for good reasons I wouldn't care, if he was using it to make shady backhand business deals that don't benefit the public I would absolutely care.