Quote:
Originally Posted by FrenchSkin
I thought of a possibility that I don't think I heard or read about (I'll express it because, to me, Cole's and Jeremiah's """reports""" are nothing more than thinking out loud):
Maybe, just maybe, this board wants KC long term but think he's asking too much, and they want to use the non exclusive tag to test his market value and still have the last word.
If you think about it they have nothing to lose:
-either no team offers KC the price he's asking and they can say "see you're not worth THAT much, take this deal";
-either a team offers him the price he wants and they can say "ok, you were right about your market value, we'll match their offer".
(In the first case he could still want to test the open market next season, in the second possibility they could decide the number is crazy high and take negotiate compensation).
Just saying, from a business stand point I can see how they can use the non-exclusive tag as a way to ask other teams to help them know how much KC's worth.
|
This is definitely entirely sensible and would be the exact tact I would be taking. Probably you as well. The key is that it presumes Allen and Snyder are sensible.
I still don't buy the Jeremiah thing. I insist on multiple sources for something like that before I really start to believe it.
It's amazing how the masses get resigned to losing Cousins based on one guy's thoughts on a radio show. Did you guys see that bookmaker.eu set odds 1-2 that Cousins would be with the team next year?
Meaning they think there's a 66% chance he'll be back. There's a reason Vegas is so glitzy and build such extravagant buildings, they're pretty good at setting odds and making money.