Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsguy
Obviously you didn't, because your prior point was that a head coach doesn't need to stay late to be successful and you used your "inside source, lol" from an era in which Gibbs was pretty much done with coaching (1992) to prove your point that a coach doesn't need to work late to be a winner. And then added that Gibbs was the one (1992) that stayed late, lol! Such a contradiction. And then I point that fact out to you, and then you say your point was that Joe Gibbs spent almost all of his time on offense - lol! Sorry, but you did a piss poor job of proving your point. I'll certainly agree to disagree, because you're wrong, lol!
|
You sound like a cry baby 5 year old trying a little too hard to prove your point. The person that worked for the Redskins basically said..." Gibbs and his guys worked more hours than the guys on defense". So my point was...was one side more successful than the other? I don't think so. I was just saying that there is no need for a coach to stay until.."the wee hours" to win. You obviously took offense to it.